Washington County pushing more Diversity

Residents of Washington County, Oregon have received emails including a draft resolution from the county, and a survey.

Here is the first part of the resolution:

Whereas, the government of Washington County is of and for all the people of Washington County; and

Whereas, Washington County is one of the most racially and ethnically diverse counties in the State of Oregon, and this diversity fuels innovation and supports robust communities and a rich cultural life in the County, the State of Oregon, and the nation; and

Whereas, areas and regions of the country that are more racially and ethnically diverse enjoy stronger economies – and often, better social and health outcomes – than those that are less diverse; and

Whereas, we, the Washington County Board of Commissioners, recognize Oregon’s and America’s long history of racial discrimination, and the many barriers in our County that impede diversity, equity, and inclusion; and

Whereas, Washington County residents of color, on average, experience higher rates of poverty and unemployment, and have lower median incomes, than the County’s White, non-Hispanic residents; and the 2018 “Leading with Race” report from the Coalition of Communities of Color noted, among other findings, that:

• Lenders in Washington County are more likely to reject home-loan applications from high income African Americans and Latinos 86% and 125% respectively, compared to those from high-income White (non-Hispanic) home loan applicants.

• 68% of Native American single mothers with children are in poverty in Washington County, a rate even higher than the national poverty rate of 48% for Native American single mothers.

• Despite these and other challenges, racial and ethnic communities in Washington County continue to build and nourish thriving families, businesses, and neighborhoods; and Whereas, these inequities can and must be addressed as Washington County has a moral and legal responsibility to provide all its residents with equitable access to the County’s public resources;

The full text of the resolution can be found here.

One of the first things that spring to mind is the very existence of a “Coalition of Communities of Color,” and the fact that such a coalition is given authority when it comes to matters of governance. Was there any input from the “Coalition of White Communities?” Of course not; such a coalition wouldn’t be recognized, assuming it was even allowed to exist. This illustrates the fact that it’s white people who are marginalized, not “people of color.”

Needless to say, the resolution did not provide any evidence that such Diversity actually does “create stronger economies.” I have sent an email to the contact person, asking for the source/evidence. If there’s a response, I’ll post it.

The email was sent out both in English and in Spanish, and there is no citizenship requirement to fill out the survey. Here’s the first page of the survey:

survey1

The survey can be found here. As far as I can tell, there is no prohibition against random people, from anywhere in the world, identifying as a Washington County “community member” or “other.” Needless to say, I did fill out the survey, and politely pointed out that many poor white people fall through the cracks, and that there are no government agencies whose job is to specifically look out for them.

It sickens me to think that even more of my tax money is going to be spent supporting the false god of Diversity. Dear readers, you have the links. Thank you.

Posted in activism, government/corporate discrimination against whites | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Interesting Quora discussion

Here’s an interesting conversation I participated in on Quora. I hope y’all enjoy it:

Scott Wallace

 “There is nothing American about immigration”. Are you frikkin kidding. If there was no immigration there would be no white people here. Zip. Nada. None.

The white people who founded this country were not immigrants; they didn’t immigrate to any specific country. Rather, they founded their OWN country. They were PIONEERS, not immigrants.

Well, this may be true, and held true between the declaration and the recognition by the English. Once that was signed, any new people who arrived in America were immigrants. By your logic, the only people who are not immigrants are the people who can claim direct ancestry to that founding population.

Which is of course bollocks.

Just be honest, that belief, and the one against immigration of non whites is racism, pure and simple.

Reuben Hayat

The European immigrants, who came afterwards, did not demand ESL programs, they did not disproportionately use social services, they did not agitate for large swaths of the US to be ceded to another country (as in Aztlan to Mexico). They did not fly the flags of their respective countries of origin. They did all they could to learn English quickly, and to become completely American. All this is a far cry from what we have today with immigrants/migrants from Latin America.

Craig Nunn

All you say is true. Its racist regardless. I also don’t have much to argue against Mr Jetts argument, he is correct in all but what can be done about it. That ship has sailed, its already too late. Close your borders, its going to delay the inevitable by a decade or two. The only viable alternative is really to re-institute the programs of ethnic cleansing that has been practiced before in the US, just on a larger scale. I’m pretty sure your immigration problem would likewise be solved….hardly anyone would ever want to go to a country that did that.

The conversation can be found here.
Posted in activism, immigration/ Hispanics | Tagged , | 2 Comments

The inadequacy of the English language

Of all the thousands of languages, English is considered to have the richest vocabulary – and yet, it’s inadequate when it comes to accurately describing current events.

Consider the “Migrant Crisis” for example, or the ongoing immigration policies of Western countries. Here’s a situation where official governments allow (or even invite) vast numbers of foreigners into their respective countries, with the intention of reducing the native population to minority status.

Let’s examine some of the words used to describe the “migrants” to Europe:

Migrant. Merriam-Webster defines it as “a person who moves regularly in order to find work especially in harvesting crops.” The implication is that said migrant will return home after the work is done; his arrival, and departure, is seasonal.

We all know that most of the “migrants” to Europe have no intention of ever returning home. Furthermore, the term “migrant” implies that it’s a harmless phenomenon; it does not imply any sort of demographic threat.

Refugee. M.W. defines it as “a person who flees to a foreign country or power to escape danger or persecution.” Again, the implication is that the refugee will return home after the danger has passed.

We all know that most of the “refugees” have no intention of ever returning home. Furthermore, the term “refugee” implies that said person is a harmless victim, whose fate is at the mercy of the host country, whose population suffers little, or no, harm from his presence.

We have witnessed, over and over again, that the presence of these “refugees” is indeed harmful to native populations. This has given rise to the term:

Rapefugee. Oddly enough, Merriam-Webster does not recognize this word. Recognized or not, this term is useful for describing the criminal element that accompanies such groups of people. Unfortunately, it’s not good enough for us; even if every single one of the “refugees” was law-abiding and respectful, they still pose a demographic threat, and they have no right to be in Europe. The use of this term carries with it an implication that, if only they were peaceful, we would be okay with it. This is not the message we should be sending.

Economic-Refugee. M.W. does not recognize this term, but Wikipedia has this to say about it:  “Although the term economic migrant is often confused with the term refugeeeconomic migrants leave their regions primarily due to harsh economic conditions, not fear of persecution on the basis of race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership of a particular social group.”

Will they go home once things have improved? Unlikely, unless conditions in their home countries become equal, or better, than in their host country. Additionally, this term doesn’t take into account the fact that the ruling class of the host country is using them as a demographic/political tool. It implies that such a migration is simply “something that naturally happens” – and it DOES naturally happen. But, in our case, the migrants are encouraged to come, so that they can serve other, nefarious, purposes. When borders are ignored, NGOs provide ships, and Mediagov covers up their crimes, then the term “economic-refugee” is inadequate to describe such players.

Economic-Migrant. Again, M.W. does not recognize this term, but Wikipedia has this to say about it: “An economic migrant is someone who emigrates from one region to another, including crossing international borders, seeking an improved standard of living, because the conditions or job opportunities in the migrant’s own region are insufficient. The United Nations uses the term migrant worker.”

In other words, the situation in the home country is not as dire as in the case of an economic refugee. There are simply not enough jobs.

It’s a well-known fact that most of the “migrants” in Europe don’t have jobs, and many are not even interested in jobs. They live comfortably enough from taxpayer-funded welfare programs. As such, most of them are parasites.

But even if all of these “migrants” were willing to make an honest living, they must still be sent home; they’re still tools of a hostile elite. Their presence still poses a demographic threat.

Invader. M.W. defines it as a person who “enters for conquest or plunder.”

This term is popular on the political right. Unfortunately, it carries a lot of historical baggage, and implies a military invasion specifically. Historically, the term has not been used to describe masses of unarmed people waltzing over borders.

Another problem with this term is that it implies that the invaders arrive to overthrow an existing government, and to install their own. In our case, the existing government ENCOURAGE their arrival. If we view the native population as a political entity in its own right, then it would be accurate to describe this influx as an invasion – since it’s certainly a violation of the autonomy of the native peoples.

If we’re speaking of the Islamic aspect of this influx, then it would certainly fit the definition of “invasion,” since many Muslims have explicitly stated that their move to Europe is to conquer it. Also, the leaching of government funds can be considered “plunder.” Taxpayers didn’t willingly give up their hard-earned Euros in order to support invaders… on second thought, some of them probably did.

What about non-Muslim “migrants?” They come for easy benefits, for jobs, for white women or for more freedom. But they still have no right to be there. They still pose a demographic threat. Whether they’re technically “invaders” or not, their presence, in large numbers, spells doom for Europe. If allowed to remain, Native Europeans will become extinct.

Immigrant. M.W. defines it as “a person who comes to a country to take up permanent residence.”

As stated, most of these “migrants” do intend to “take up permanent residence.” But this term makes no distinction between a small, assimilable, group of people and an enormous influx of unassimilable people who will eventually overwhelm the native population.

Additionally, the term “immigrant” assigns all of the volition to the “immigrant.” It completely ignores the other side of the equation: The hostile elites of the host country, who believe they’ll benefit from such an influx. They play an active role in this, and the term we use should reflect this.

Asylum seeker. M.W. does not recognize this term, but the BBC, in a 1995 article about this very same topic, says it… “refers to someone who has applied for refugee status and is waiting to hear the result of their claim.

Again, this term assigns all volition to the “asylum seeker,” and none to the hostile elites of the host country. It also fails to take the demographic threat into consideration.

Undocumented migrant. This term, suggested by the above BBC article, is too sanitary; we can lump it in with “undocumented immigrant” as part of the Left’s useless euphemisms.

People have been moving around since before we were even human, and much of that movement has been involuntary.

The Assyrians pioneered the tactic of forced resettlement toward various ends. From Ha’aretz:

During the mid-eight century B.C.E., the Assyrians under the leadership of Tiglath-Pileser III grew in all directions. Order was maintained in the realm by means of a program of mass deportation and transplantation of conquered peoples.

More recently, Stalin imposed forcefully deported many peoples in the Soviet Union. If not for the fall of the Soviet Union, Estonians and Latvians would might have become minorities in their own lands. From Wikipedia:

Immediately after the war, a major influx from other USSR republics primarily of ethnic Russians took place in the Baltic states as part of a de facto process of Russification

In Latvia and Estonia, less was done to slow down Russian immigration. By the 1980s Russians made up about third of the population in Estonia, while in Latvia, ethnic Latvians made up only about half of the population. In contrast, in 1989 only 9.4% of Lithuania’s population were Russians.

To the best of my knowledge, however, never before in human history has a representative government intentionally reduced its own native population to minority status.

Now that this is happening, throughout the West, it’s no wonder that we don’t have a word to describe the people whose importation brings this about.

I do have one suggestion, and please feel free to submit your own in comments:

Pawnigrant. This refers somebody who willingly migrated to a foreign country, with no intention of returning to his homeland, who is one of a multitude, and whose arrival is supported by a local hostile elite toward a large-scale economic, political, or demographic, goal.

 

 

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Leftists eating their own

A couple of days ago, we were treated to Stephen King getting slammed for suggesting that quality is more important than Diversity. The horror! From Yahoo People:

Stephen King is facing some heat for a tweet in response to the mostly white 2020 Oscar nominations.

After the list of nominees was announced early Monday morning, Twitter was quickly up in arms over the lack of diversity, with Cynthia Erivo listed as the only person of color in the acting categories.

King, an Academy member, entered the online discussion, explaining how he votes on the nominees.

“As a writer, I am allowed to nominate in just 3 categories: Best Picture, Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Original Screenplay. For me, the diversity issue–as it applies to individual actors and directors, anyway–did not come up. That said…” King wrote in the first tweet.

“…I would never consider diversity in matters of art. Only quality. It seems to me that to do otherwise would be wrong,” he said in the second.

Of course, King’s original tweet was correct; we should strive for excellence, not for Diversity, and awards should be given based on accomplishments, not on race or gender. If King were a real man, he would have laughed in their faces, and shrugged of such criticism. But he’s a wimp who allows mere tweets to intimidate him – and he’s wealthy enough that he doesn’t need anybody.

Yesterday, I read an article from Common Dreams, attacking CNN:

CNN Is Truly a Terrible Influence on This Country’: Democratic Debate Moderators Pilloried for Centrist Talking Points and Anti-Sanders Bias

“This is an unusually vile performance by CNN,” tweeted Rolling Stone contributing editor Matt Taibbi.

Critics of the corporate media as well as supporters and staffers of Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign blasted the moderators of the CNN/Des Moines Register Democratic presidential debate Tuesday night for employing centrist talking points and demonstrating a bias against Sanders in how they framed questions…

As Common Dreams reported, the financial burden of deploying American forces was notably absent during first part of the debate—a lengthy discussion on foreign policy and war—but the moderators did ask candidates about the costs of implementing Medicare for All healthcare, as Sanders has proposed. That contrast, and the presentation of the healthcare questions, sparked swift condemnation from progressives.

Overall, a team of Rolling Stone writers called the debate moderators’ questions “mystifyingly inane.” In a piece titled “CNN Completely Botched the Democratic Presidential Debate,” HuffPost‘s Zach Carter called them “awful.” According to him, the debate on the whole was “tedious, interminable, frivolous… a fiasco of irrelevance held three weeks before the Iowa caucuses.”

“Again and again, CNN anchors substituted centrist talking points for questions―and then followed up predictable responses with further centrist talking points, rarely illuminating any substantive disagreements between the candidates or problems with their policy positions,” he wrote…

They may have a point, that CNN is biased against Sanders…

… but it makes me wonder, just how far left would CNN have to go to satisfy the likes of Common Dreams?

Common Dreams describes itself thusly:

We share our readers’ progressive values of social justice, human rights, equality and peace. Common Dreams is committed to not only being your trusted news source, but to encouraging critical thinking and civic action on a diverse range of social, economic, and civil rights issues affecting individuals and their communities.

I found the ethnic makeup of their “Views” staff interesting. From what I could tell, it’s comprised of:

2 Hispanics

9 whites

4 probable Jews

4 Mid Easterners/ South Asians (including Ralph Nader)

Oh, and there’s ONE black woman.

Is this what “America looks like” according to progressives? At least they got the gender ratio almost right: Nine of the twenty are female.

 

 

Posted in shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

No justice in California

A couple was arrested for baiting, and beating, bicycle thieves outside their home. From the LA Times:

For months, police said, a Visalia, Calif., couple left a bicycle unattended outside their home in order to bait passersby into stealing it. Once someone took the bike, the couple would run from their home and, on at least four occasions, police said, beat the person with a baseball bat.

Visalia police arrested the couple Wednesday. They face charges of assault with a deadly weapon and conspiracy.

Police say Corey Curnutt, 25, and Savannah Grillot, 29, posted videos of the assaults to YouTube from July through November. Video shows the unattended bike in the front of the house. In two instances, a person takes the bicycle off the property. Once that person reaches the sidewalk, two people identified by police as Curnett and Grillot run from their home with a baseball bat in hand…

A GoFundMe page shared on Curnutt’s Facebook page said that after the couple’s car window was busted and money was stolen, followed later by the theft of their son’s bicycle and other items, law enforcement was contacted but no arrests were made.

“They decided to use a scare tactic in effort to convince people to stop stealing from them,” the page reads.

This couple should be applauded, not prosecuted. Presumably, they paid taxes. They PAID their local police department to uphold the law, and to serve them. Instead, local police took their money, and did NOTHING.

This is to be expected. From National Review:

California’s Proposition 47 downgraded a variety of “non-serious, nonviolent crimes” that had previously been considered felonies to misdemeanors. These include shoplifting, grand theft, receiving stolen property, forgery, fraud, and writing bad checks. As long as the total value of the stolen property is under $950, only a ghost of an offense has occurred. A thief may now steal something under that limit on a daily basis and it will never rise to felony status.

In the event that a perpetrator is pursued and apprehended, the consequence can be a small fine or a brief stay in jail, In reality, these repercussions are rare. In addition, DNA samples aren’t collected from misdemeanor offenders. Thus the DNA database has shrunk, making it more difficult for law-enforcement agencies to solve cold cases, including those involving rape and murder.

There are times when some sort of vigilante justice is justified, and this is one such case. If your property is being stolen, and the government will not help you, then you have a right to take matters into your own hands.

This is yet one more example of California’s dysfunction. I hope Corey and Savannah are spared any serious consequences for their actions. Maybe next time, they should be more careful, and discrete, about how they protect their own property.

Posted in crime and violence | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

I need your help!

No, I’m not asking for money. What I’m asking for is time-donation.

Aside from writing this blog, I’m also active on Quora.com (username Reuben Hayat). I’ll be active there until (inevitably) I’m banned for good. At that point, maybe I’ll actually find time to visit the shooting range; it’s been too long.

Quora is a great way to reach a wider audience, and to educate people. I’ve actually had some success in opening peoples’ eyes. But sometimes it’s a lonely fight. Leftist bias is rampant. They do tolerate conservative views, and there are some good conservative writers, some of whom straddle the line to white-advocacy. Those writers have some immunity, since they’re well-established, with large followings.

Not so yours truly. Most of the time, when I write about race, my post gets deleted for “violating Quora policy.” The accusations are typically baseless, and appeals are often futile.

Yesterday, somebody asked that I answer the question “Why are African Americans treated differently in the US?” Here’s what I answered (within hours, it was removed for “violating Quora policy”):

It’s required by law, just as different treatment of women is required by law. The notion that ALL demographics will produce equal results, given the same opportunities, is the official policy of the US government.

Unfortunately, nature does not agree with the US government, and the races/genders are NOT equal.

We see unequal results in contact sports, with American blacks having an advantage – but this isn’t viewed as problematic, since blacks are an official “victim group.”

Discrimination against whites is expected, and encouraged. for example, defending accusations of racism, McDonalds recently defended itself thusly:

“McDonald’s said it disagreed with the characterization of the company’s behavior. In a statement, it said 45% of its corporate officers and all of its field vice-presidents are people of color.” (McDonald’s: black executives sue over ‘systematic’ racial discrimination).

In a country that’s still around 66% white, nobody cares that whites are underrepresented among McDonald’s corporate officers – and NONEXISTENT among its vice-presidents.

Obama-era guidelines force school districts to treat students differently based on race; if they discipline too many black students, the district will run afoul of federal guidelines, and lose money:

“The directive, cast as a “guidance,” in fact formalized a fundamental shift in the Department of Education’s approach to civil rights enforcement. Prior to the Dear Colleague Letter, the standard held that civil rights are violated if students are treated differently because of race; for instance, if a black student and a white student both curse at a teacher, it’s wrong to suspend the black student and give the white student a warning. The Dear Colleague Letter expanded the standard from disparate treatment to disparate impact; now, if two black students and one white student curse at a teacher, it could be a civil rights violation to punish them all equally.” (Obama’s School Discipline Guidelines Put Students in Grave Danger | Manhattan Institute).

What about college admissions? An Obama-era judge just ruled that it’s okay for Harvard University to discriminate in favor of blacks, at the expense of Asians and whites:

“A federal judge in Massachusetts has ruled that Harvard University does not illegally discriminate against Asian Americans.

The keyword is “illegally.” Harvard does discriminate against Asian Americans in its college admissions process.

District Court Judge Allison Burroughs concedes that Harvard follows a “racially conscious” admissions system that gives a plus to black and Hispanic applicants but dings Asian applicants, according to Harvard’s own internal review.

Treating a group worse or better than the way people usually are treated is the dictionary definition of discrimination, though Burroughs takes pains to avoid using the term in her decision.

But the Massachusetts judge, a Barack Obama appointee, maintained in the ruling Tuesday that Harvard’s discrimination was legal because Harvard demonstrated a compelling rationale for needing its race-conscious admissions program, and that such a program was the only way for the college to fulfill that rationale.” (Why Using Racial Discrimination to Create a Diverse University Is a Bad Idea).

Are black and white employees treated equally in today’s workforce? Not in my experience. For example, when I worked at a fairly large company, we had bad hires of all backgrounds – but when I asked about one particularly bad employee, who happened to be black, I was told (by my manager) that since he’s a member of a “protected group,” HR requires a lot more documentation before he can be gotten rid of. It’s much more difficult to fire a black employee than to fire a white employee.

Far from addressing past anti-black policies, such practices/attitudes PERPETUATE them.

When employers know that it’s harder to fire black employees, don’t you think they’ll shy away from hiring them in the first place?

When white McDonalds employees see blacks getting promoted ahead of them, creating a glass-ceiling for whites, don’t you think this will create some resentment?

When black students see that they can get away with misbehaving in school, don’t you think this will have the effect of encouraging such misbehavior?

The way forward is to treat people with equality, not to force a racial caste-system upon American society.

So, if you’ve got spare time on your hands, please create an account there, read the rules. Post on a variety of topics. When you write about race, or white-advocacy, remember to take baby steps and to be polite.

Also remember to upvote my comments, assuming you agree with them, and to report anti-white questions and answers. Yes, they do remove anti-white content when it’s reported. You can also follow me there.

 

Posted in activism | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

“Boxy” thinking from Red Ice

I was watching the most recent “Flashback Friday” video, from Red Ice, and (18:28), they brought up a disturbing story. It’s from the National File:

Pastor’s Wife Celebrates Transgender Child’s Puberty Blockers, Paid by Church Insurance

In a viral Facebook post, activist mother of trans child, Jamie Bruesehoff, celebrated the insertion of puberty blocking implant.

Her trans daughter, Rebekah, 12, is a public figure with their own Facebook page…

I completely agree with Red Ice, that this is disgusting. The story speaks for itself. But Henrik and Lana felt the need to point out that most such medical devices are produced in Israel, and then to claim that Israel is willing to encourage this type of behavior in the US, but not within its own borders.

As for Israel producing hormone-blocking products, this may be so, but let’s take this in context; Israel is the source of a multitude of revolutionary technologies, including medical devices. I’ll point out that Israel is also a leading innovator in medical devices for pregnant women. It would not be surprising if an Israeli technology is utilized some time during Lana’s pregnancy.

I’ll take this opportunity to wish Lana and Henrik a smooth, and successful, pregnancy, culminating in healthy children and lots of joy.

What about the claim that Israel doesn’t allow such perversions within its own borders? It’s simply not true. Within Israel’s secular community, which comprises the great majority, liberals push the same agenda that they do in the Western world. Israel is quite LGBT-friendly. If there are no children in Israel using the same hormone-blocking implant, it means little – as it’s extremely rare even in the West. Hence, the “celebrity status” of this child.

We all know there is a “Jewish Problem.” We know that Jews are often at the forefront of the War against Whites. It’s no secret, and there are plenty of factual accusations that can be leveled against such Jews. So there is no need to manufacture anti-white Jewish conspiracies where there are none, or to take baseless cheap shots.

And there’s no need for Red Ice to pepper their videos with snide remarks aimed at Jews. It’s not productive at all; just deal with the issue head on. They don’t need to worry about YouTube banning them anymore.

Earlier in the video (6:10), Henrik remarks that modern design, which utilizes many linear and square patterns, may be intended to make our thinking “boxy.”

The frequent use of boogeymen is, in my opinion, an example of “boxy” thinking. It’s easy to cartoonize your opponents, portraying them as if they’re villains in a comic book. In such comic books, villains are purely evil, and heroes are purely good. There is very little nuance. At a certain level, it’s intellectually lazy to use an entire demographic as a prop in such a way, as if they’re villains in a comic book.

This is my main criticism against the book “Camp of the Saints.” Though prophetic, the book fails to portray the invading hordes as human beings. They might as well be a swarm of locusts, or a colony of ants. This may have been intentional, but it’s counterproductive. If you portray your opponents (for lack of a better word) in such a way, sooner or later, people are going to actually meet them, and realize that they’re quite human after all. At that point, you’ve lost credibility.

Consider what happened to Derek Black, the son of Don Black, founder of Stormfront. One can only imagine what horrors Derek was taught about Jews as he grew up. Inevitably, Derek moved out and met REAL Jews – who turned out to be very nice. Now Derek is a flaming liberal.

I wouldn’t waste my time criticizing hard-core Jew-haters, such as we find at Stormfront or The Daily Stormer. We can only hope that they see the error of their ways on their own. Red Ice is better than that.

I live in Portland. Sometimes, when I get home, I feel like I’ve walked through a jungle, with monkeys flinging excrement at me. I can turn on my computer and let the cheerful dispositions of Henrik and Lana wash away all the filth. They’re a great source of inspiration for many of us. For this I am grateful.

Wouldn’t it be nice if we could live in a world where Jews and white-advocates got along? We pro-white Jews do what we can to foster cooperation. An occasional nod of acknowledgment (as in “POC allies”) would be nice.

Keep up the good work Red Ice. I always wish for your well being and success.

 

Posted in politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 2 Comments