Eric Holder’s hypocrisy

Over the last few weeks, we’ve heard attorney general Eric Holder rush to judgment about Arizona’s new immigration law, SB1070.  He’s voiced concerns about its constitutionality.  Now we learn that Holder has not even read the law, which is only a few pages long, and he has admitted as much in an interview.

It’s old news that those in government rarely actually read the laws they either oppose or support.  But I’ve always thought it odd that one as bigoted as Holder would have the audacity to say:

“I don’t think it’s racist in its motivation.  But I think the concern I have is how it will be perceived and how it perhaps could be enacted, how it could be carried out.  I think we could potentially get on a slippery slope where people will be picked on because of how they look as opposed to what they have done, and that is I think something that we have to try to avoid at all costs.”

… but, at the same time, defend “affirmative action” – which he, himself, is a beneficiary of.  Leave it to a Washington insider to be so flagrantly blind to his own contradictions.

It makes a lot of sense to take race into consideration when trying to apprehend illegal immigrants; after all, most of them are mestizos.  What did not make sense was choosing Holder for attorney general because of his race.  Perhaps Obama felt that because Holder has a healthy dose of white blood, he would be smart enough to stay out of trouble and avoid embarrassing the administration.  Maybe, when God sees a mulatto check off the “African American” box on his census form, He takes 15 I.Q. points away from that person.  This would explain a lot.

About jewamongyou

I am a paleolibertarian Jew who is also a race-realist. My opinions are often out of the mainstream and often considered "odd" but are they incorrect? Feel free to set me right if you believe so!
This entry was posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Eric Holder’s hypocrisy

  1. Portland realist says:

    HAHAHA! Good one man. Once the mulatto decides he’s black he’s got it in for the white devil and he’s got a big dose of dumb that infects his head.

    He should pay himself reparations and pass himself up for his own job. That would make perfect sense to race-obsessed liberals wouldn’t it?

  2. Beaver Falls Bob says:

    Apparently the whole Obama regime doesn’t bother to read – SPN Headlines reports on a fiasco involving the White House chef:

    Keep smiling! :-)

  3. Bay Area Guy says:


    So much for the myth that “blacks have to be twice as good in order to get half the reward.”

    I’m not denying that blacks are unequal to most other groups (particularly whites) when it comes to income, health care, education, housing, treatment by law enforcement, etc. Even though I’m a proud white advocate, there’s no point in denying that relatively speaking, blacks aren’t exactly living the high life.

    That being said, in the case of Holder, the whole notion that “blacks have to work twice as hard in order to get half the reward” is bogus, as it certainly doesn’t apply to him.

    My god, he couldn’t even read a stinkin’ 10 page document, yet he has the audacity to unquestioningly vilify Arizona’s democratic law (which I don’t entirely agree with, for reasons I’ve stated on a previous post) as unconstitutional!

    Forget being twice as good. Heck, forget even being good! Holder is simply a lousy and incompetent attorney general.

    Speaking of the whole myth that blacks have to be twice as good, let’s take a look at Obama and his success.

    Oh sure, the anti-racists insist that he had to overcome barriers of prejudice, avoid talking about racism so as not to come across as an “angry black man,” deal with the Jeremiah Wright controversy and questions about his patriotism, endure assassination threats and unflattering attacks on his family, such as the New Yorker cartoon, New York Post cartoon, and monkey images of Michelle Obama on google (which, by the way, I do not condone. Though I liked the New Yorker cartoon), and endure relentless right-wing/tea-bagger/media vitriol upon becoming president.

    To a certain extent, what they say is true. However, they also ignore the flip side of Obama’s exotic racial background.

    -Were it not for Obama’s racial background, he wouldn’t have won the monolithic black vote in the Democratic primary, without which he couldn’t have won the nomination. Yeah, I know, some will point out that Al Sharpton didn’t enjoy a ton of black support, but he’s a complete idiot. When blacks find any black candidate who is even remotely qualified and has a good chance of winning, they go for the brotha.

    -Were it not for his exotic racial background, young people, who have been brainwashed into embracing “diversity” and PC multiracialism, would not have been drooling over him. People would not have seen him as embodying “hope and change.” They would not have seen him as someone who can walk on water. For those anti-racists who think I’m full of it, just know that I witnessed such sentiments personally.

    -Were it not for his exotic racial background, he wouldn’t have won the Nobel Peace Prize despite escalating warfare in Afghanistan.

    Basically, only his exotic background, combined with excellent speaking skills, swagger, and sense of expediency allowed him o win.

    Again, for you anti-racists who think I’m full of it, let me ask you this: Would a two year white senator named Walter Smith from a midwestern state be able to generate such popularity and media exposure? Would he have been able to defeat Hilary Clinton in the primary, considering he wouldn’t enjoy the monolithic black vote and young peoples’ enthusiasm?

    I think we all know the answer. I know, I know, blacks still face horrible discrimination (again, I do believe that anti-black racism exists to a certain extent. I just don’t believe that racism is the suffocating, omnipotent force Tim Wise and his acolytes make it out to be) and we still have sooo much more work to do. Also, Obama’s inability to tackle racism is another example of “white privilege.” The racist hate his election has provoked only validates anti-racism and proves just how twisted we “melanin-challenged” (a term Timmy the Unwise likes to use) whites are.

    Blah blah blah. I’ve heard virtually every anti-racist screed that’s ever existed.

    The point I am trying to make is that the whole notion that blacks are are all horribly oppressed and cannot enjoy success unless they are twice as good as whites is baloney. If that were the case, a two year senator would not have been elected to the highest office in the land, and an incompetent ideologue like Eric Holder would not occupy such a powerful position.

    The way I see it, if “white privilege” is so suffocating, Obama and Holder should not be important enough to even be heard of, much less occupying two of the most powerful positions in this nation.

    Something to think about.

  4. Bay Area Guy says:

    Speaking of politics and the myth that blacks have to be twice as good as whites, something else came to mind.

    I’m sure you have heard of Hank Johnson, the replacement of Cynthia McKinney.

    For those of you who don’t know, he’s the fool who expressed concerns over a proposal to add a few thousand additional troops to Guam out of fear that the island might tip over and capsize.

    Wow! As idiotic and embarrassing as Dubya was, I don’t think that even he said anything that stupid!

    Sure, Hank Johnson must truly be an overworked and unappreciated black politician victimized by cruel white racism.

    *Rolls Eyes*

    Anyway, here’s the video, in case you want a good laugh!

    So much for being twice as good.

    • jewamongyou says:

      A while back I showed this video to my (liberal) family and even they cracked up. On Johnson’s website, they claimed that this was a “subtle attempt at humor”. I don’t think so.

      • Bay Area Guy says:

        “Subtle attempt at humor?”

        Hogwash! He certainly didn’t sound like he was joking. Even before he made his idiotic capsizing remark, he could barely form a coherent sentence, and revealed his linguistic deficiency.

        The guy is simply an idiot.

  5. patrick says:

    Jewamongyou… can I call you jay for short?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s