The establishment Left, and the masses whose opinions they control, would have us believe that there is no rhyme or reason when it comes to interracial relationships. In their world, love is colorblind and observations to the contrary are not welcome.
I have already expounded on this fallacy elsewhere, as have others. So the aim of this post is not to reiterate the obvious. Instead, I want to point out that every common phenomenon has a name and every group of people, that engages in recognized trends, has a name. White women who lust after black men have a name: “Coal-burners”. Granted, there is probably a name for white men who lust after black women as well – but most people would have to look it up, considering how unusual it is.
The establishment Left, and the coal-burners themselves, would tell us that the term “coal-burner” is a slur, vulgar and outside of civilized parlance. They might rather we use the term “white chicks who dig black dudes” or something else just as convoluted.
It seems to me that there should be nothing offensive about either “coal” or “burning”, except, perhaps, to an environmentalist worried about carbon footprints. The reason they find the term offensive is simply because there is a term for it. Even if we called them “flower-kissers” or “stocking-wearers” or any other random combination of words, the term would still be “offensive” – because it recognizes that there is a lack of randomness in racial pairings. It brings attention to the fact that coal-burners are part of a larger agenda. By extension, it also implies that these women are being manipulated – in other words, they are not masters of their own free will.
Some have suggested that coal-burners prefer black men because they are, supposedly, superior to other men in some ways. Ironically, it is those same women who typically claim that race is only skin-deep. They do not see the contradiction between their words and their actions; if race is only skin-deep, then why the preference for men of one skin color over another? If race is more than skin-deep, then aversion is just as legitimate as preference – just as some prefer cats over dogs while others hold the opposite opinion. We cannot have it both ways; if there is something to like, then there is also something to dislike.
As for those supposed traits that make black men desirable, it is a fact that coal-burners will ignore those same traits in a white man. Their attraction to black men cannot be explained by them (with any credibility) in any rational manner. But must people always have rational reasons for being attracted to others? Of course not – but, in this case, they are being manipulated for nefarious reasons. One could just about call it “rape”.