When I say “our movements”, I am referring to the libertarian movement and the pro-white movement. Libertarians have taken the deficiency of women in their ranks seriously. We need women in order to make lots of little libertarian babies – oh, and sometimes those women can contribute to our cause in other ways too. Here is an interview with Allison Gibbs by Tim Cavanaugh. Yes, Cavanaugh bobs his head too much and this is annoying, nevertheless it’s a good interview:
The pro-white movement could certainly use women like Gibbs. Those who orchestrate the massive anti-white propaganda campaign are well aware that women are the soft underbelly of the white race. Women care, far more than men, about being trendy and fashionable so, as long as white is depicted as the opposite of trendy and fashionable, many women will fall for it. It has been said countless times already, but I’ll say it again: The pro-white movement needs to put on a happy face and be more positive in order to attract women. Happy and positive are always trendy and fashionable.
I have always suspected that the ancient Jewish sages, when they saw that the people of Israel were about to become vulnerable minorities in a vast diaspora, knew that Jewish women would be the most likely targets of our enemies. This is why they decided that it would be the mother whose lineage determines Jewish identity. Of course there would have been other factors as well – the fact that the mother is usually the one actually raising the child and the fact that the mother’s identity is almost always known. Unfortunately, whites cannot simply decree that a white mother is all one needs to be fully white. Not with any credibility.
In our own times, Islam is being spread in Europe primarily via its women. Just as blacks in America assault the white race on two fronts, miscegenation with white women and assault against them, so too are Muslims in Europe using these two tactics at the same time – though not always by the same men. If European peoples are to survive, their women need protection within a strong and nurturing living ethnic identity. Since the fall of Christianity in Europe, there is no such identity any longer. To fill the vacuum, we have an unimpeded invasion by Africans and Muslims. They do have strong cultures and belief systems, and women are attracted to this. Women are not attracted to weakness. The only way Europe can project strength is to take pride in its own heritage. Since the concept of “nationality” has been usurped by statists, who have reduced it to a piece of paper, Europeans must define themselves otherwise. They cannot define themselves by culture; “culture” can mean almost anything. Is a Frenchman who refuses to eat Escargot no longer French? What about a Brit who roots for the wrong sports team? This leaves race as the only reasonable trait that Europeans can use to define themselves. It is also the only one directly given to them by Mother Nature. In short, “heritage” means race. The only way Europe can save itself is for white nationalism to become mainstream. The recruitment of women to this cause is crucial to its survival. But the traditional role of women, as submissive, does not work in our favor here.
One irony of this situation is that the feminist movement, which generally plays the role of villain, has also emboldened women to take leading roles and to assert themselves against the mainstream. Feminism has, to a certain degree, made women more like men. This can work in our favor. The anti-white mainstream is so firmly entrenched that only the most independent thinkers can break free of it. Though many women only fool themselves into thinking they are as free-thinking as men, some actually are. Not nearly enough, to be sure, but it is a start. I think, as the reality of rape statistics and abuse become more widely known, more and more middle-of-the-road feminists will start to take their blinders off. One can hope.