Racialist spillover to anti-Islamism

Very few of us, relatively speaking, are race-conscious.  Whether in Europe or the U.S., our numbers are small – practically negligible.  The taboos against speaking the truth about race are very strong.  Too strong for most people to even entertain the thought.

A step down from race-realists are the “conservatives”.  Many of them are Christian.  Some are atheist.  Yet others are Jewish (or both Jewish and atheist).  These “conservatives” often entertain race-realist ideas in their subconscious.  Some of them are even aware of these thoughts, but dare not speak them.  At a certain level, in their psyches, they know that their own race, the white race, is in grave danger.  At some level, they identify with their own race.  But they cannot put into words what they are thinking.  It is too dangerous – not just for their family, their jobs or their social circles, but even for themselves.  They would consider themselves bad people if they even acknowledged their own deepest thoughts.  This fear and loathing needs an outlet of some sort.

This is where Islam comes in.  As politically incorrect as it may be to criticize Islam, it is not nearly as taboo as criticizing another race – such as blacks or Mestizos.  The conservatives, described above, take their suppressed fear and loathing of blacks and/or Mestizos and project it onto Muslims.  This is not to say that there is nothing to fear or loath about Islam.  But I do believe that some of the vitriol, directed toward Islam, should be directed at the invading alien races.  Geert Wilders was acquitted of attacking Islam – but he would never have been acquitted of attacking blacks.  Most likely, Wilder does not recognized the dangers of massive black immigration into Europe.  Even if he did, he would not say so.  But there can be little doubt that many who support him do understand what is at stake.  They oppose all non-white immigration into Europe, but Islam provides a (somewhat) permissible guise to rally under.  And there are, of course, those who do not understand what they understand.  The Left seems to appreciate this, which is why they often refer to anti-Muslim sentiments as “racism”.  We should bear this in mind when we are told that “Geert is not our friend”.  Perhaps not, but many of his followers surely are, whether they realize it or not.


About jewamongyou

I am a paleolibertarian Jew who is also a race-realist. My opinions are often out of the mainstream and often considered "odd" but are they incorrect? Feel free to set me right if you believe so!
This entry was posted in immigration/ Hispanics, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Racialist spillover to anti-Islamism

  1. Ryan says:

    There is nothing to gain out of the left’s ideology for the descendants of Western Civilization. Nothing! This is nothing but suicide and contempt for one’s self and people- I wish constantly that we will get out of it soon and look after each other before other people- you know, like the ones that threatened to kill us, like the ones that attempted several times before European expansion, who are also all trying to get rid of us today at this second!

  2. Like Pavlov’s dogs salivating at the sound of a bell, Whites have been programmed to express shock and dismay when confronted with race realism. Like a pinch on the cheek evokes an “ouch,” the mention of race realism prompts the “racist!” allegation.

    White people have allowed themselves to be reduced to a culture of programmed lab mice.

    And . . .

    White people view themselves as race neutral.

  3. Jehu says:

    Perhaps pro-whites need to subvert organizations like the Sierra Club to give environmentalist cover to their desire to avoid racial replacement.

  4. fred says:


    I put enough thought into these issues that it’s rare someone comes up with an idea I agree with but haven’t either encountered or thought of before. That was a very astute and reasonable observation. Good job.

  5. Eunice says:

    Check out Zek’s rebuttal against your last post. He makes a lot of valid points.

    • jewamongyou says:

      He makes two valid points – both of which are based on the fact that I can’t know what’s in his head. Other than that, he says nothing.

      • fred says:

        I just read zek’s “rebuttal”. He’s immature and emotionally driven. You shouldn’t waste your time.

    • Ex*&^%$#@!scuse me? This guy Zek uses “butthurt” in an ostensibly serious piece about race and psychology and I’m supposed to believe he “makes a lot of valid points”?

      I read that whole chain of left-wing anti-white spew to get to the word “butthurt”. Great, Zek, when you get junior high school you can join the debate team.

      Butthurt – because nothing makes a leftist chortle with joy like a white man getting sodomized by a gang of black convicts. Modern leftists are really no different from Robespierre, Marx, Lenin, and Stalin.

  6. Irish Savant says:

    This is a good insight – I had never looked at it this way before. If you look at the things Geert criticises about Islam, its essential incompatbility with western society, it’s a short step from that to applying to Africans and others. I obviously don’t know what he actually feels, but for sure he’d be dead meat (maybe literally) were he to extend his opposition to blacks and such.

    • (un)concerned says:

      I think that for Europe, Islam really is a problem, and one they don’t want to see get worse. I don’t blame them. As far as race is concerned, why ruin an immigration reform movement, one that’s having far more success than ours, by injecting racial concerns into the mix if there’s no need yet?

  7. countenance says:


    You’re probably very familiar with the hobby horse of a certain constituency, that “the j-people” are “giving us permission” to hate Muslims because Muslims threaten Israel and European Jews, and more and more American Jews.

    First, off, I don’t think any people, J or otherwise, have that sort of power to grant these kinds of permissions. But the theory just got blown out of the water because the ADL and AJC are siding with Shari’ah Law and against Oklahoma and other states that don’t want it to attach itself to jurisprudence. Also, Elena Kagan has come out for Shari’ah.

  8. (un)concerned says:

    Perhaps wisdom is not so uncommon after all. I’ve always felt the same thing about anti-Islam invective. The anger is so intense because they’re the only alien “element” that’s cool (because of 9/11 and other terrorist acts) to bash. Since no one who’s interested in having a roof over his head is willing to criticize high immigration or, GAWD FORBID, black people, Muslims serve as the objects for all of that “conservative” wrath that has no other outlet.

  9. Annoyed says:

    Of course, they channel their anger about the racial problems the white population faces into an obsession with muslims who are still publicly hate-able/dislikeable.

    The same people hate illegal immigrants but refuse to support significantly reducing legal immigration which as a much of problem as illegal.

    Now I’m not saying muslims aren’t a problem, they just happen to be much less of a problem compared to what we are faceing on the whole.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s