Who’s to blame for the mob black-on-white violence?

Watch this video:

It is obvious that the blonde anchor, in the red shirt, very much wants to tell it like it is.  She knows that the problem is unruly blacks – and she knows that we know that this is so – but she is not allowed to use the word “black”.  Throughout the entire discussion, the word “black” (or any permutation of it) is not mentioned once.  It must be frustrating.

But what we do hear mentioned is “twitter” and “the internet”.  I am predicting that the media, and government, will use the flash mob phenomenon to push for restrictions on twitter and the internet.  What I see on the horizon is a grave threat to what remains of our freedom of speech.

This is their modus operandi:  Encourage, and allow, NAM’s to attack whites.  Then use those self-same attacks as an excuse to deprive whites of their rights.  When whites protest, they are called “racists” or “suspected terrorists”.

About jewamongyou

I am a paleolibertarian Jew who is also a race-realist. My opinions are often out of the mainstream and often considered "odd" but are they incorrect? Feel free to set me right if you believe so!
This entry was posted in crime and violence, freedom of speech issues. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Who’s to blame for the mob black-on-white violence?

  1. destructure says:

    You’re behind the curve on this one. They’ve been trying to do that for over a year.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1287695/Obama-given-right-shut-internet-kill-switch.html

    The irony is that during the London riots attacks were coordinated via Twitter and the authorities never shut it down. See, it’s called the freedom of tyranny. People always think there is no freedom under tyranny but that’s not true at all. There is plenty of freedom under tyranny. In fact, under tyranny one can do anything the tyrants don’t mind ie illegal immigration. It’s the things that tyrants do mind that aren’t allowed ie political correctness.

  2. John says:

    At least they show the video, which says more than anything that can come out of their mouths. It is frustrating though, that they simply can’t call a spade a spade.

    Michelle Malkin was on Fox a couple weeks ago and was quite explicit about calling this youfs problem a black problem; that was a rare exception, unfortunately, but as long as they show the videos (which they should unfailingly do), then everybody can see what is really happening.

  3. seedofjapheth says:

    Referring to blacks as “youths” is racist because it hearkens back to a time when slave masters would call their male adult slaves “boy”. I am surprised the mainstream media is allowing the racist term “youths” be applied to black Americans.

  4. DFA says:

    As I always tell leftists, Fox News isn’t racist, if it was I’d actually watch it. The blonde anchor is Laura Ingrham, Derb wrote an article for Taki’s a couple weeks ago about her coverage of the “youth” mobs.

  5. countenance says:

    DFA:

    Obviously, Laura Ingraham wouldn’t cite race, because one of her three adopted children is a Guatemalan. She also opposes “white racism.”

  6. Bay Area Guy says:

    Yeah, Fox “News” is pretty pathetic.

    For an English speaking media outlet that is willing to point out the racial elephant in the room and is even willing to offer a fair hearing to white activists, I would highly recommend Russia Today.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s