Most of you have seen it. It goes like this:
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
The “cult of the mantra” has taken some heat from pro-whites. For example, a comment on Unamusement Park reads:
Damn, I hate the “mantra”. It’s silly that people copy and paste it as a cheap substitute for actually participating in discussions. Then when people (leftists) challenge them, they don’t actually back it up. I went through this on the SPLC blog not long ago.
Though I agree with Anna (the commenter on Unamusement Park) that a lot of people use the Mantra in the way she describes, I would also prefer organic, grass-fed, beef over the mass-produced, corn-fed, variety we find in grocery stores. However, if the latter were not available, a lot of people might go hungry. And like most people, I enjoy wholesome, home-cooked meals when they’re available. But sometimes pre-packaged food is all that’s available, or all I can afford, or all I have time for.
Not everybody has the time, or the ability, to engage in meaningful conversations about race online. Worse still, many pro-whites believe they have the ability to make eloquent points about the ongoing genocide against their people – but make themselves look like fools when they try; their posts are so full of spelling/grammatical errors that they make people unsympathetic to our cause.
I think it’s good that people have the option of a pre-packaged version of a pro-white argument. It’s better than silence, it’s better than making yourself look like an idiot, and it might make some people start to ask questions and think.
As for Anna’s point about not backing it up, denizens of leftist boards are not interested in meaningful debate anyway. If you do try to support the Mantra with facts and statistics, they won’t read them – and you’ll probably just get banned. Therefore, with leftists it’s better to use the “knock-out game” tactic. Strike them by surprise and strike them hard. Then run and go somewhere else rather than waste your time with them “debating”. The Mantra is as good a tool for this as any other. I would add, however, that it should be changed periodically; there probably shouldn’t be just one “Mantra”, but the concept is a good one.