There has been some controversy regarding the use of social networks by sex-offenders.
If I had to venture a guess as to what percentage of Americans would instinctively, and emphatically, answer “no” to this questions, I’d say it would hover at around 90%. There can be little doubt that many (maybe even most) of those people would, themselves, be considered “sex-offenders” if the government knew all their dirty secrets.
But in reality, the question makes no sense. There is no natural category of people, distinguished in any meaningful way, as “sex-offenders”. While, to the uneducated masses, the term is synonymous with “child-rapist”, in fact it is nothing but a government-created concept whose only real meaning is the legal status of an arbitrarily defined group of people.
Readers of the blog “human stupidity” are well aware of the absurd circumstances that can lead to one being considered a “sex-offender”. Even the term “rape” has little meaning any more. Urinating on the side of the road can earn you this stigma, as can keeping photos of yourself taken while you were still a minor.
Punishments and restrictions, imposed by power of the law, should certainly be utilized in order to protect the public. Thus, if a person clearly poses a threat to those around him, we have no choice but to keep an eye on him or restrict him. But many “sex-offenders” do not fit this description. While it’s true that some jurisdictions do distinguish between different types of offenses, any question that starts with “should sex-offenders be…” needs clarification.
“Sex-offender” is just one of many terms the ruling elite has created, and used as ammunition, against us. “Racist” is another such term; it lumps together violent neo-Nazi skinheads with reasonable, nonviolent, bloggers – or anybody who takes a stand against the oppression against whites.
Let us stop playing along with their word games.