As they say, “different strokes for different folks”. Ever since the evil elite forced racial integration upon us and declared open season on white women, by black men, millions of of black men, who wish to participate in the War against Whites have had three paths they could take to take advantage of the white race’s soft underbelly:
1) Murder white women.
1) Rape white women.
3) Seduce white women.
Murder: Though the controlled media maintains a code of strict silence when it comes to reporting the vast scale of the murder of whites, those of us who take the time to educate ourselves know that its victims are too many to count. Unlike the hoary, black-and-white photos of black lynching victims, the photos of white victims are in color – since most of them were murdered quite recently. I urge you to peruse the latest addition to my blogroll, violence-against-whites and to show it to your friends, family and co-workers. The gruesome murder of Nicola Furlong in Japan, by American black rappers, is just the latest of a long string of such incidents. Actually, I take that back; she was murdered a few days ago. Similar killings are probably taking place even as I write.
Rape: Tens of thousands of white women are raped by black men each year. From Wikipedia:
According to United States Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, there were overall 191,670 victims of rape or sexual assault reported in 2005. Of 6 U.S. women and 1 of 33 U.S. men have experienced an attempted or completed rape. (according to Colorado Coalition Against Sexual Assault). The U.S. Department of Justice compiles statistics on crime by race, but only between and among people categorized as black or white. The statistics for whites include hispanic and non hispanic whites combined. There were 194,270 white and 17,920 black victims of rape or sexual assault reported in 2006.
However, the report does give a note that for the instances of white-on-black rape the statistic is based on 10 or fewer sample cases.
In contrast, Lawrence Auster writes, in Frontpage Magazine:
The table does not gives statistics for Hispanic victims and offenders. But the bottom line on interracial white/black and black/white rape is clear:
In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.
What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.
Government/media attempts to downplay the racial aspect of rape fail miserably.
Seduce: I use the term “seduce”, but there can be a fine line between seduction and rape. The Rothschild heiress who fell for an American rapper was probably not raped by the rapper. Instead, she was raped by the hostile establishment that glorifies “gangsta culture” and anything connected with American black ghetto ways.
Predatory dating is not strictly a black-white phenomenon. Some Sikhs in Britain have also noticed that Pakistani Muslim men are targeting Sikh girls in order to win them for Islam:
Islamic societies and Muslim student organisations in universities and colleges have in the past targeted Sikh students in pursuit of converting Sikh girls to Islam. A decade ago the British Organisation of Sikh Students worked with the NUS to ban Islamic fundamentalists from UK university campuses. However, the new news of Muslim extremists infiltrating student organisations and societies in university and college is worrying for the Sikh community.
Sikh Societies have been talking about what they have observed of tactics of Islamic Societies at “fresher fair” approaching people and bombarding with questions and how only Islam is true and everyone else is damned to hell.
With the beginning of the new academic year the ‘fundamentalist Muslims’ issue has come to light once again in universities, with fundamentalist preying upon ignorant Sikhs who know little or nothing about the Sikh faith. Sikh students are bombarded with questions upon questions about Sikhi which is followed up by distorted accounts of Sikh religion.
Other tactics have also been reported in past and Sikh student organisations have received information of numerous accounts of Islamic organisations paying £10,000 plus to Muslims who will convert Sikhs. A notions has been embedded in to Muslims that converting a Sikh into Islam will give there whole family a straight ticket to heaven. On top of the monetarily and afterlife incentive Muslims who have converted someone into there faith seem to be looked highly upon but certain members of community as for fulfilling “there duty.” Numerous methods are being used to convert people from deceiving female students, seducing them and making them pregnant in order to convert them.
Sikh societies and Sikh student organisation should be vigilant of this subtle and direct extreme missionary preaching by Islamic organisations and as a community we should address the issue of many Sikh youngsters being ignorant of the Sikh faith and therefore, vulnerable to dangerous Muslim radicals.
That article was from 2005. Apparently, it was considered politically correct to point out such tactics against Sikhs – but not against whites. I think it’s worth quoting a comment from the above forum. I found it insightful (typos and all):
Sikh girls have not been taken by muslims for first time. Since Ahmad Shah abad ali time sikh girls have been going into muslims possession by some means or other force or allurment.
It is when ever you have been weak that girls leave you either voluntarily or by force.
Girls are Oestrogenic driven creatures and are attracted by testosterone driven males and not by a Moron whining men like you .
So how do you define a testerone driven man . It all depends upon which society you live in.
It’s true. The hemorrhaging of white women is both a cause and a symptom of weakness. Shame on white men for allowing their women to be victimized and taken advantage of. Shame on white women for melting like butter when the times call for a more steadfast attitude.
I don’t think I would ever try to seduce a Sikh woman. I mean, all her brothers, uncles, and male cousins carry daggers as an act of religious devotion. Of course, if I thought that getting a Sikh dagger in the chest got me a ticket to paradise, maybe I would act differently….
So you would not seek a Sikh?
Pure coincidence that Amren just ran a story about the rape of a Sikh woman by a Muslim:
I didn’t even see it until well after publishing this post. Interesting.
It’s true that white women are targeted by blacks, but with some exceptions, the majority who date blacks are sluts, stupid, or very fat. Many times all three. So is it such a bad thing? Wolves eat only the slowest and weakest deer, and by doing so they keep the herd strong and healthy. Obviously this lady is no loss to the Rothschilds.
I see this argument a lot, and my reservation about it is the assumption that being a slut or fat is hereditary. Even being “stupid” (just as often ignorant) is not always hereditary. It’s a good upbringing that prevents women from falling for such tricks. In any case, even if some genetically undesirable women are taken from the herd, too many desirable ones are taken with them.
There is an hereditary component for sure. All women are exposed to the same culture and many to the same upbringing, but only some fall for the lies. Even among the most leftist college girls I’ve seen some with an instinctual fear of black men and some who embrace them.
It’s true that there are real losses too but that has always been true. White people shouldn’t think like Arabs. Western civilization didn’t dominate the world by squeezing out the most morons and degenerates. Whites are not going extinct and I don’t understand why some people think this. Liberalism is just an evolutionary dead end. Nature is taking its course.
I’d be willing to bet a lot of white women who date black men grew up in single mother households. The real rise of wf/bm dating took place in the 90s. That was the first generation with a non-trivial amount of out of wedlock births.
A lot of it depends on where you are. In places with large black populations, it’s mostly the undesirable white women who date them.
“Decent” white women who date black men are more likely to be from states or cities in which there are very few black people. With so few AA’s around, white people just attribute any typical thug behavior to individuality. These white folks don’t have enough exposure to see the patterns in the larger population. Therefore, they have the luxury of hanging on to their liberalism.
Another thought that occurs to me is that when the elites fall for the same propaganda as the masses, can we still think of it as some sort of conspiracy or is it just organic decay of culture.
Reblogged this on Hidden British News.
On the plus side:
1 in 3 are willing to openly speak against the cultural marxists propaganda. Just imagine how many are secretly thinking the same thing as that 1 in 3 but are too afraid to openly express it.
I’d take that survey with a grain of salt. The threshold for being “racist” is so low over there that the term has become meaningless.
There is something I have been pondering, the word racist has taken on different socially understood definitions from the time it was first used. The direction of the words social definition has become more and more ant-white. Who is driving it?
Will there ever be a point at which the white population rises up against the term?
I honestly don’t think running away from it is ideologically helpfull, I think we should not say “we’re not racist”. I think we should state clearly our specific goals and views. We are racist in so far as we value one race over the other and it does us no good to say otherwise.
Of 6 U.S. women and 1 of 33 U.S. men have experienced an attempted or completed rape. (according to Colorado Coalition Against Sexual Assault)
I’d be careful about using statistics like this. These numbers have their origins in various feminist and women’s studies programs which routinely exaggerate the numbers of rapes, or conflate them with sexual assaults, in order to create hysteria over rape–which they can then use for their own political purposes.
Indeed; my main point was the huge disparity between white-on-black rape and black-on-white rape.
Apopkian said “the majority who date blacks are sluts, stupid, or very fat. Many times all three.”
A few years ago that would have been my general observation, but on several recent trips to Europe I have noticed many (even a majority) of very attractive white women (invariably blonde) with blacks. They mostly didn’t look slutty or stupid either, I’m just reporting what I have observed not condoning it. If I had to guess I’d say that a lot of it has to do with white women’s eagerness to display their “anti-racist” credentials and simultaneously black men taking advantage of whites terror of being accused of racism for rejecting a black.
I heard that German girls like to sleep with american black soldiers that are stationed there. I can guess they might be displaying the anti-racist credentials like you say, but do most of them marry or have babies?
My impression is that a lot of interracial couples specifically want babies just so they can rub them in the faces of conservatives. Simply having an interracial baby is now a status symbol in some circles. If so, then those babies are born of hate and were brought into being as a product of genocide. If this is the case, then it’s very sad
“They mostly didn’t look slutty or stupid either”
The model Doutzen Kroes would be an example:
Kate Rothschild may or may not be slutty, but she is definitely not fat and probably not totally stupid. She is also not from a trashy background on any branch of the family tree. Her non-Rothschild ancestors include the Guinness family (mother) and non-Jewish British gentry (father’s mother). She is only a peripheral member of the Rothschild family who has no role in their banking establishments, but her actions certainly don’t reflect well on them and can’t be a morale booster. S
Please don’t use the 2005 NCVS figures. They are a statistical blip. The basic fact: blacks assault whites, whites hardly ever assault blacks, is true. But using misleading figures harms us. We have no power, only the truth. So we must get our facts right.
I was not aware that those figures were inaccurate. Do you have more reliable ones?