The hostile media has grown so accustomed to using the term “youth” as a euphemism for “niggers” (unruly black savages) that even white nationalists have come to use the term this way. We say to each other snidely, “Did you hear about the most recent ‘youth‘ attack?” or “Be careful of that neighborhood; it’s got a lot of ‘youth’.”
It’s easy to forget that whites can also be youths – in the classical (archaic?) meaning of the term. It is white (and Asian) youth that bears the brunt of crimes such as forced integration. Adults may feel bad about white children living in fear and getting beaten up or worse – but it’s the white children who must deal with these realities face to face each day. It’s the white children who are being forced to attend school with animals and it’s white teens and young adults who, because they can’t afford a car, are forced to share the buses and trains with savages.
As if this is not bad enough, white youth is punished for the sins of NAM (non-Asian minority) youth. For example, the Portland leftist rag The Willamette Weekly writes (July 4, 2012 in a piece called “Teenage Wasteland”):
Portland is a paradise with cool bands, no cover and cheap drinks – if you can get past the bouncer’s flashlight.
It’s not so kind to the underage.
Cops are on the lookout for packs of kids brawling in Laurelhurst Park. The Gresham MAX station blares classical music to deter loiterers. The city might ban skateboards from some streets.
“Laurelhurst Park”… that name rings a bell. Ah yes! That’s the park where a pack of feral niggers (I’ll use the technical term here since white “youth” is the topic of this post) were beating up whites. How convenient for the Willamette to forget this detail. Is the Gresham MAX station blaring classical music in order to repel white youngsters? I doubt it. But white kids do skateboard. They had to throw something in that is relevant to whites.
Are cops targeting black kids at Laurelhurst Park? Woe be to them if they do; we’d never hear the end of it! That would be RACISM!
Are our nation’s cities plagued by gangs of white youths wreaking havoc and mayhem in their wake? Hardly. It’s black and Hispanic youth committing the crime. And yet the law cannot distinguish, when enforcing curfew laws, between violent gangs of NAM’s and harmless white kids. Police officers, using whatever common sense they are allowed, will make this distinction on occasion. But this use of common sense is frowned upon:
Are curfews racist?
Not inherently, but usually they turn out to be. Curfew laws give a great amount of discretion to police officers, which for reasons we won’t get into here, often leads to racist enforcement of curfew laws. Curfew laws are heavily enforced in black neighborhoods, but not as much in white neighborhoods. Likewise white youth are less likely to be stopped by police than black youth. Because of this, the rate of arrest for blacks in 2000 was 71% higher than that for whites.
There is no comment option at “NYRA”, so we are unable to inform the author that black neighborhoods experience much higher crime rates than other neighborhoods – and that these crimes are (get ready for this…) committed by blacks. Police officers figure this out fairly quickly and thus, they become “racists”. Yes, knowledge and experience will make you racist.
Most readers of this blog are already aware of the tragic cost, in blood, that whites pay for “diversity”. Let us not forget that whites, even when they survive to adulthood, often have their youth stolen from them as well.