The theft of white youth

The hostile media has grown so accustomed to using the term “youth” as a euphemism for “niggers” (unruly black savages) that even white nationalists have come to use the term this way. We say to each other snidely, “Did you hear about the most recent ‘youth‘ attack?” or “Be careful of that neighborhood; it’s got a lot of ‘youth’.”

It’s easy to forget that whites can also be youths – in the classical (archaic?) meaning of the term. It is white (and Asian) youth that bears the brunt of crimes such as forced integration. Adults may feel bad about white children living in fear and getting beaten up or worse – but it’s the white children who must deal with these realities face to face each day. It’s the white children who are being forced to attend school with animals and it’s white teens and young adults who, because they can’t afford a car, are forced to share the buses and trains with savages.

As if this is not bad enough, white youth is punished for the sins of NAM (non-Asian minority) youth. For example, the Portland leftist rag The Willamette Weekly writes (July 4, 2012 in a piece called “Teenage Wasteland”):

Portland is a paradise with cool bands, no cover and cheap drinks – if you can get past the bouncer’s flashlight.

It’s not so kind to the underage.

Cops are on the lookout for packs of kids brawling in Laurelhurst Park. The Gresham MAX station blares classical music to deter loiterers. The city might ban skateboards from some streets.

“Laurelhurst Park”… that name rings a bell. Ah yes! That’s the park where a pack of feral niggers (I’ll use the technical term here since white “youth” is the topic of this post) were beating up whites. How convenient for the Willamette to forget this detail. Is the Gresham MAX station blaring classical music in order to repel white youngsters? I doubt it. But white kids do skateboard. They had to throw something in that is relevant to whites.

Are cops targeting black kids at Laurelhurst Park? Woe be to them if they do; we’d never hear the end of it! That would be RACISM!

Are our nation’s cities plagued by gangs of white youths wreaking havoc and mayhem in their wake? Hardly. It’s black and Hispanic youth committing the crime. And yet the law cannot distinguish, when enforcing curfew laws, between violent gangs of NAM’s and harmless white kids. Police officers, using whatever common sense they are allowed, will make this distinction on occasion. But this use of common sense is frowned upon:

Are curfews racist?

Not inherently, but usually they turn out to be. Curfew laws give a great amount of discretion to police officers, which for reasons we won’t get into here, often leads to racist enforcement of curfew laws. Curfew laws are heavily enforced in black neighborhoods, but not as much in white neighborhoods. Likewise white youth are less likely to be stopped by police than black youth. Because of this, the rate of arrest for blacks in 2000 was 71% higher than that for whites.

There is no comment option at “NYRA”, so we are unable to inform the author that black neighborhoods experience much higher crime rates than other neighborhoods – and that these crimes are (get ready for this…) committed by blacks. Police officers figure this out fairly quickly and thus, they become “racists”. Yes, knowledge and experience will make you racist.

Most readers of this blog are already aware of the tragic cost, in blood, that whites pay for “diversity”. Let us not forget that whites, even when they survive to adulthood, often have their youth stolen from them as well.

About jewamongyou

I am a paleolibertarian Jew who is also a race-realist. My opinions are often out of the mainstream and often considered "odd" but are they incorrect? Feel free to set me right if you believe so!
This entry was posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, examples of propaganda. Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to The theft of white youth

  1. Yew says:

    Do I qualify as a “model minority”? LOL!

    Youth IS used in the media to describe young white people. I heard it on the news just the other day while sitting in that waiting room that had a TV on.

    What’s your youtube channel url again?

    “It’s the white children who are being forced to attend school with animals and it’s white teens and young adults who, because they can’t afford a car, are forced to share the buses and trains with savages.”

    Google “Karen Klein” Those savages are white, with the exception of the Latino kid, who nonetheless is “white hispanic”.

    Their behaviour is INCONCEIVABLE in my culture. And you know what? I bet ALL of them are from divorced families. Prove me wrong!

    • jewamongyou says:

      I could point to instances of Asians being cruel. In fact, there are many such instances – but this doesn’t negate the overall good qualities of Asian people. In the same way, nobody denies the existence of morally bankrupt white people. But horrible as the behavior of those kids was, it does not represent the wholesale, systematic, persecution of older people. Also, heartless as their behavior was, at least there was no physical assault. A day doesn’t go by in America without gang attacks by blacks against whites and Asians – but it rarely makes the news.

    • Sagat says:

      JAY is talking about feral Black “youths” that beat, rape and murder innocent people and you bring up some rotten White kids that verbally abused a bus monitor?! Please stop being a moron.

      • TWTS says:

        Of course he points out kids verbally assaulting a woman on a bus, words matter more to leftists than actions. Calling a savage a savage is far worse to them than the savage behavior of the savage.

      • Yew says:

        “Of course he points out kids verbally assaulting a woman on a bus, words matter more to leftists than actions. ”

        Leftist? LOL. This coming from a person who is probably pro-divorce and pro post divorce single parent dating.

        You probably wouldn’t know right or conservative behaviour if it bit you on the bazooka.

        Like I said, WN will get nowhere because white people are not into family. Y’all love your “individuawism” and “fweedom” too much. Let’s not forget the “I’m just not in love with him/her anymore” and “I’m so un-haaaaaaaaaapy”.

  2. Black Death says:

    “Most readers of this blog are already aware of the tragic cost, in blood, that whites pay for “diversity”. Let us not forget that whites, even when they survive to adulthood, often have their youth stolen from them as well.”

    ….

    Well, OK, but only some whites pay the price. The kids of the limousine liberals who push all this “diversity” crap don’t ride public buses or subways, don’t live in dangerous neighborhoods and don’t attend failing public schools full of savages. They get driven everywhere they want to go in the family SUV, live in tony suburbs or gated communities and attend private academies. It’s only the whites of the poor and lower middle classes that get the sort of treatment you describe. Which is probably the point of the whole exercise.

  3. Sagat says:

    Both my kids are teenagers now so what you say hits home with me and it’s a damn shame. They can’t even do such normal teenage things like go shopping at the mall by themselves because every mall in my city has banned unaccompanied teenagers. Of course, it’s not the White and Asian kids, who for the most part have money to spend and a reason to be there, that needed to be banned.

    And forget about riding the bus. The main bus terminal here is a wasteland where robberies occur in broad daylight and this is despite the fact that there’s cops posted there. I’ve let my son ride the bus in the past, but he’s seen the danger for himself and decided on his own that it wasn’t worth the stress. I hate that it’s this way for them, because I can’t imagine how my youth would’ve been spent if I didn’t have such great public transportation to use.

  4. Yew says:

    JAY, the reason WN will never work is because 50% of them are divorced and the other 50% will never marry. Neither group is interested in having kids, forget about having kids at minimum replacement level.

    • You’re talking about a status quo that White nationalism (or, more precisely, White advocacy) seeks to change being a reason it will never work?

      The reason white fertility levels are so low is that secular Whites only reproduce in high-trust, low-crime environments. That is why the race-Marxists were so keen on getting as many Blacks as possible into White “ethnic” neighborhoods (i.e. areas with lots of Eastern and Southern Europeans, close-knit extended families, etc.) Only when Polish, Italian, and Jewish kids were getting their heads broken on the streets could the Marxists really hurt the neighborhoods and start bringing the birth rate down.

      Telling Whites to just hunker down and have babies in the gang-infested neighborhoods so many Whites are forced to live is sort of like telling giant pandas that they need to f*** to save their species. It’s against our nature to just sit in squalor and have babies knowing that they’ll be targeted by the crackheads next door.

      Certainly things were different a century ago, but that’s not the point. Low White birthrates are part of the plan.

      • Yew says:

        “The reason white fertility levels are so low is that secular Whites only reproduce in high-trust, low-crime environments.”

        NO. The reason white fertility levels are so low is that Whites are not family oriented. You like “individuawism” and “fweedom”. Let’s not forget the whines of “I’m just not in wove with him/her anymore” and “I’m so un-haaaaaaaaaaaaaaapy”.

      • Why don’t you just admit that you don’t know anything about White people? Do you even know any White people?

        Do you very often hear Whites telling you how Asians think?

        This sort of thing demonstrates that the more self-critical Whites are, and the more we are willing to take criticism, the more people of other races will take that as a simple sign of weakness and go into the business (often an actual money-making business) of insulting and mocking us.

        We’re treated as thin-skinned because we’re thick-skinned, treated as oppressive because we are so tolerant an coëxist so well, treated as stupid because we are smart, treated as arrogant because we are so humble, etc.

    • countenance says:

      You’re comparing apples and oranges, Yew. “White Nationalism” isn’t incumbent on how many white people there are in the world. “White Nationalism” is just as valid a social phenomenon if there are 5 or 500,000,000 white people on Earth.

  5. TWTS says:

    The Chicago Tribune cited a stat yesterday that every year for the past 20 years blacks have made-up over 70% of homicide victims in the city, is that because the cops are unfairly targeting them, or is it just that blacks are more likely to commit murder?

  6. Annoyed says:

    -If no government programs exsisted to sustain nonwhite populations in the US, you would see them drastically decline.

    White people are more keen on having kids after they are in a finacially stable posistion and only have roughly 2. Nonwhites breed without thought and rely on social services to support them.

  7. Yew says:

    “White people are more keen on having kids after they are in a finacially stable posistion and only have roughly 2. Nonwhites breed without thought and rely on social services to support them.”

    And then comes the “but I just don’t love him/her anymore. Like, I mean, I LOVE him/her but I’m not IN love with him/her, like, you know what I mean?”

    Then you people get divorced, thereby psychologically damaging your kids forever, then you start dating, often online, and damage them even further because they grow up watching mom (and dad on the weekends) trying to get laid.

    Incredibly uncultured and undignified.

    And oh yeah, step dads and “boyfriends” of single moms are statistically more likely to molest or otherwise beat/kill the kids than anyone else!

    But at least you can congratulate yourselves that your first marriage wasn’t til you hit 30 and could “afford” kids.

    Bravo! Salud!

    • Apopkian says:

      Yew,

      You seem very confused. The post doesn’t claim that whites are perfect. I agree with you that the loss of traditional values and the rise in divorces is a big issue in the white community.

      What does that have anything to do with large numbers of blacks acting like savages? Do you think it makes it okay?

      • Sagat says:

        What does that have anything to do with large numbers of blacks acting like savages?

        Yew isn’t interested in discussing the topic at hand and is only here to derail the conversation. It’s likely that Yew was never able to land a woman and blames White Americans for this. An Asian girl he fancied probably ran off with a White man. His bitterness is palpable,

    • When Whites get together to discuss our issues, it’s pretty frequent that an Asian will show up with the usual mockery.

      I can’t even imagine the reverse.

      • (Not so) Stealth says:

        The bad part is that he’s right, to a certain extent. Here where I live, white people have their own version of “keeping it real.” As a group, we are far too concerned with being seen as cool/tough/sexy/intellectual by other white people to bother worrying about the future of our country or even about our futures as individuals. I wish I had a dime for every time I’ve heard some version of “I wish I had studied more in college and partied less.” Hell, I wish I had a dime for every time I’ve said it. We’re pretty pathetic as a people.

      • Under the burden of Marxian education, people fail to live up to their potential. The Chinese could have been much more happy and prosperous than they were under the Great Leap Forward, but the supported that program anyway because they were taught to.

        In the US we learn Marxian individualism rather than Marxian collectivism. It cripples us in a different way, to be sure, but at you’ve pointed out, it’s just as potent as other forms of Marxism.

        Now. Can you think of an example of a Westerner and saying, “The thing that’s screwed up about you Chinese people is ____ and ____. Your thinking is messed by ____ which makes you wrong in this way: ____”. I can’t think of an example or conceive of one, at least not with an American.

        Do you see the problem? As long as criticism is a one-way street the relationship between America / the English-speaking world / the Western world, and the rest of the world, will be screwed from the outset. If you’re in a boxing match, and you can’t punch back, you’ll lose even if you’re not fighting Joe Louis. Since I don’t particularly care to dig up dirt on China, I basically have no interested in discoursing with Yew Among You or Yan Shen or of those guys on their own terms.

  8. (Not so) Stealth says:

    Oh, my: the “N” word! It seems to fit some of them really well.

    • YEW AMONG YOU says:

      “Now. Can you think of an example of a Westerner and saying, “The thing that’s screwed up about you Chinese people is ____ and ____. Your thinking is messed by ____ which makes you wrong in this way: ____”. I can’t think of an example or conceive of one, at least not with an American. ”

      Are you kidding me? Americans offer unlimited critiques of other cultures.

      And yes, I know hundreds of white people, personally. At least 50% of them are divorced and dating – with kids!

      Look, I’m not saying you aren’t “nice” people. But the whole world knows marriage and family is not your strong suit.

      • Apopkian says:

        It’s valid to criticize white people for their corrupt and selfish culture, and also to criticize the Chinese for things like forced abortions and murdering tens of millions of their own people when the subject being discussed is related.

        Neither of those things are relevant to this post about black behavior.

  9. Yew says:

    “The Gresham MAX station blares classical music to deter loiterers. ”

    Curious how that would deter loiterers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s