Django Unchained should be illegal

I have not seen Django Unchained; I refuse to support the movie industry with my hard-earned money. But I did read a review of it at American Renaissance. Some excerpts:

In a December 8 appearance on “Saturday Night Live,” the lead actor, Jamie Foxx, explained what the movie is about:

It’s good to be black. Black is the new white. In my new movie, I play a slave. How black is that? I have to wear chains. How whack is that? I get free. I save my wife, and I kill all the white people in the movie. How great is that? And how black is that?”

The crowd erupted in laughter, whooping, and applause…

One reviewer, Richard Corliss of Time, mentions Django’s reply when Schultz ask him to be his partner: “Kill white folks and they pay you for it? What’s not to like?” Mr. Corliss calls this “a tantalizing question.” Let us imagine a movie by Mel Gibson, say, in which someone is offered money to assassinate leftwing media types. Would he still think “What’s not to like?” was a “a tantalizing question?” Or would he wail in print about the murderous hatreds of the American Right?…

… As Steve Sailor has noted, a black posted a comment about the movie:

While whites are busy getting offended on our behalf, they miss completely why we are going to see this film. It’s a black man killing white people in masses. I will pay to see that every time.

I’ve seen this film 3 times so far and am going again Saturday night. It’s an awesome movie.

“Awesome” is another way of saying “inspiring.”

Twitchy.com, which tracks twitter messages, found this sort of thing:

“After watching Django, all I wanna do is shoot white people.”

“Still hype off Django. I’m gonna kill some white people today.”

“Django got me wanting to kill white people!”

“Django made me wanna kill so many white people.”

Reading this review, I could not help but be reminded of another article at American Renaissance, about the movie Machete, where we read:

In Hollywood’s latest anti-White film, the hero is a blood-thirsty illegal alien of Latino ethnicity who slaughters white people with a myriad of weapons. White people are presented as the “bad guys.” Even the trailer of the film {snip} begins with the militant Latino telling the viewers that he has a “special message” for the people of Arizona, who valiantly stood up for Western Culture and state sovereignty vis-à-vis a recent law that prescribed penalties for those who aid in the invasion of our country.

Both movies should be illegal, and all those involved with their production should be prosecuted for inciting violence. A defense that the movies are “works of fiction” should be countered with the fact that they are actually thinly veiled messages that are relevant to contemporary America. The messages are: White people are evil and you are justified in killing them as cruelly as possible.

I realize that this form of incitement is a legal grey area, and I’m certain that there will be a comment or two explaining why there can be no prosecution in such cases. But how does our society view such works as The Turner Diaries? It has been described as having incited actual acts of terrorism and crime. You will not find it at your public library. In contrast, you probably will find Machete at your public library. No doubt, Django Unchained will also be available there in a couple of years. A description of The Turner Diaries, at Amazon, reads:

At 9:02 am on Wednesday April 19, 1995, two tons of explosives ripped apart the federal office building in Oklahoma City and the psyche of America. The worst case of domestic terrorism in our history, this explosion killed 169 men, women, and children. The author of this book has written, If [this book] had been available to the general public . . . the Oklahoma bombing would not have come as such a surprise. It has been considered by the Justice Department and other government agencies as the bible of right-wing militia groups, and the FBI believes it provided the blueprint for the Oklahoma City bombing. Barricade Books has published it so America can better understand the cause of racism and extremism.

In other words, it is for educational purposes only. Still, I wouldn’t be surprised if ordering it online will get your name added to a government watch list. For sheer psychological impact, a novel cannot come close to the power of a professionally-made movie. If The Turner Diaries was responsible for hundreds of deaths, movies such as Django Unchained and Machete are responsible for thousands. These movies are far more harmful than novels such as The Turner Diaries for another reason: They add fuel to a fire that is already there. Even before the release of these movies, blacks and Mexicans had been murdering whites at unprecedented rates. They build on an anti-white establishment that already used the full force of public schools, the federal government, “higher education” and corporate America (in other words, anybody with power) to promote the idea that whites are evil and “people of color” are good. The movies serve as effective means of reinforcing the hatred of whites that is pounded into our skulls from cradle to grave.

The Turner Diaries is the equivalent of giving a normal, healthy, man a gun and telling him to shoot his neighbors. Django Unchained and Machete are the equivalent of giving the gun to a deranged man, who is already enraged at his neighbors, and telling him to shoot them. Which scenario is more dangerous? It’s true that some readers of The Turner Diaries are already deranged, angry, individuals. But they represent a miniscule number of people when compared to the seething masses of hateful, vengeful, blacks and Mexicans. White violence against blacks and Mexicans is a rare aberration. Black and Mexican violence against whites is a way of life. The last thing we need is to encourage it even more.

About jewamongyou

I am a paleolibertarian Jew who is also a race-realist. My opinions are often out of the mainstream and often considered "odd" but are they incorrect? Feel free to set me right if you believe so!
This entry was posted in crime and violence, examples of propaganda, government/corporate discrimination against whites. Bookmark the permalink.

32 Responses to Django Unchained should be illegal

  1. Atheist Race Realist says:

    I’m sure if someone committed violence against Whites because of Django Unchained the police would never record it. If they did write it in the report the media would never speak of it. So we’ll probably never know how many attacks were because of this movie.

    Of course the police and media would tell themselves it’s to stop those evil horrible White racists from attacking innocent “people of color” if that information came out. Even though the irony is that they are protecting real racists by doing stuff like that.

    Oh and our local library gets in new releases right when they come out. So expect it at libraries in months rather than years.

    Also if you want to see a movie but give no money to Hollywood there are ways to go about it. I try to keep money out of Hollywood as much as I can. Hollywood has also converted our copyright laws into a joke, so I never feel bad. Here is a great video about our horrible copyright laws.

    This guy is great. He explains many topics in an interesting way. I don’t know what his political affiliations are but he keeps them out of his videos.

    • countenance says:

      There has already been a black on white hate crime in reaction to DU. Official authorities are already covering it up.

      http://redondobeach.patch.com/articles/stabbing-victims-in-stable-condition

      • jewamongyou says:

        It’s true that that movie was playing at the time, but how can we know that it was what inspired the stabber? Blacks have never needed an excuse to attack whites. They do it “randomly” all the time.

    • jewamongyou says:

      That’s really good and funny. Thanks for sharing.

      • elan says:

        why shouldnt we attack you guys all the time you had us as slaves for over 400 yrs..on top of that your parents robbed ours of knowledge of self this is why my people suffer today..but it will all end soon as it is written in the bible and quran!

      • jewamongyou says:

        Firstly, my ancestors were poor Jews in Eastern Europe; none of them were slaveholder. Plus, the vast majority of whites today did not have slave-holding ancestors. But even if they were, so what? As a Jew, do I have the right to murder modern Egyptians because their ancestors enslaved my ancestors? Obviously not. Many modern Africans are descended from African who owned other Africans (slavery was endemic in Africa), so would you have modern Africa embroiled in a huge civil war over this? Today’s blacks don’t suffer from white oppression. They suffer from black dysfunction.

  2. Gayle says:

    I don’t know. I’m really ambivalent about this. I mean… those of us who are older were raised watching cowboys slaughter indians on Saturday morning TV. Clint Eastwood made a good living from violent revenge movies, as did Mel Gibson, among others. Why call in the heavy hand of government now? Because it’s showing violence against whites?

    That said… conservatives need to start committing themselves to cultural secession. The fact that we support leftists every time we watch TV, or go to a movie, should give us pause. And yet, mention to this to many conservatives, and their eyes will glaze over – heaven forfend that they should change their entertainment habits in any way, even if the result is a weakened enemy.

    A thought experiment: how different would our culture be today if all of us on the right refused to give our time, money and minds to the mass entertainment/news industries?

    People on the right need to be calling for self-discipline, thoughtful cleansing of our lifestyles, and secession from the horrifying, evil, many-headed monster that is modern culture. Not for more government intervention.

    * And uh… yes, I’m actually glad that whites are buying guns in record numbers. I’m not a sheep ;)

    • jewamongyou says:

      I see what you’re saying. It’s not that it depicts violence against whites. It’s that ONLY violence against whites is shown in a positive light and encouraged. The old cowboy and Indian movies did the same with Indians – but few people had the opportunity, or inclination, to follow through and go forth to kill Indians. This is not the case with whites.

  3. Kiwiguy says:

    No doubt your standard SWPL Foxx’s comments would be seen as tongue in cheek, ironic & all in good fun. I probably would have a few years ago. I think I slowly started to change my views when I saw a documentary about the OJ Simpson trial (which I hadn’t followed that closely at the time in NZ) and realised how r8cist some blacks are.

    Also, mediums like Twitter are excellent for revealing the nastier, darker, raw views on the ground.

  4. DT says:

    Did anyone ever notice just how dumb this guy’s movies are? Aside from the horrible racial messages, they are just plain stupid ass movies. He is himself ugly as sin and seems touched in the head.

  5. John says:

    Feeling your whiteness eh? Didn’t you notice the same MESSAGE is Inglorious Basterds?

    The Germans were just proxies for white Americans.

    • jewamongyou says:

      I never saw it and wouldn’t know about it unless I’d read a review on one of the websites I frequent.

      • John says:

        You should watch it. A Jewish Commando kill the top Nazis in a Cinema and the theatre owner is a Jewess with a projectionist black lover. The allegory is pretty heavy handed. Eli Roth plays the “Bear Jew”.

        It was a either deeply ironic or deeply anti-White. Django suggests it was the latter. The Nazis were obviously a safe proxy for WASPs.

      • SFG says:

        I suppose. I suspect Tarantino really wanted to do Nazis and WW2 in his trademark style.

    • Georgia Resident says:

      The “heroes” in Inglorious Basterds are a Jewess and her black lover (according to Steve Sailer’s review). I strongly doubt that JAY would have liked it any better than we would have.

      • John says:

        Doesn’t need to be liked to carry the same idea.

      • SFG says:

        What, Jews killing Nazis? I think Tarantino wanted to do WW2 so he could kill lots of Nazis, since he likes to kill people and nobody objects to killing Nazis (except for alt-righters). Recall he actually has a ‘good’ German who defects and helps the Basterds.

  6. destructure says:

    I saw Django Unchained and Inglorious Bastards and I’ve read The Turner Diaries. But I didn’t pay for any of them. Like you I refuse to financially support it. I watched more from concern than entertainment. I thought all of it was demonization of the worst sort in that it presents a certain group of people as evil. The heroes run around massacring a whole class of people but, hey, they deserved it because the story was written such that the “hero” was justified in murdering and even torturing them. So the audience is tricked into feeling good about murdering people. That’s sick. Now tell me how that doesn’t bleed off into someone’s subconscious?

    One can say, “Oh, it’s just a movie, Everyone knows its not real!” But that doesn’t keep it from reprogramming the subconscious as if it were real.
    I’m amazed that people who cry at sad movies or startle when a cat jumps out at a particularly intense horror scene think they’re not being influenced on a subconscious level. Fortunately, Django may not have that effect because it was so ridiculous I doubt many people could get sucked into it. Though most of the people reading this probably wouldn’t be receptive to anti white programming anyway. I’m more concerned about the influence from less bombastic and more realistic movies. Or even video games. It seems like every mass shooter the last few years has been a first person shooter video game junkie.

    • Atheist Race Realist says:

      Ah yes, those evil video games. Strange that everyone I know plays them but somehow doesn’t go shooting people in real life.

      You know what Call of Duty actually taught me? That I never, ever, ever want to be in the army and go to a another country to fight a war.

      Oh you didn’t see a guy 100 yards away in the bushes with a rifle? Well you are dead now.

      I died 1,000 deaths in the campaign but you only have 1 chance in real life.

      Halo taught me that Aliens are actually really bad at destroying earth. All you need is a pistol to destroy them.

      • John says:

        That’s not the problem. The games channel aggression into simulation. I’d prefer it if young men where off conquering Africa instead of making their eyes bleed in their basement or bedroom.

      • SFG says:

        No, you don’t. Once you conquer a country, you have to run it, which means sending troops over there. Which means lots of lost money and a lot of dead Americans.

        Let Africa do its own thing. They don’t have the organization or firepower to bother us unless we import lots of their natives here as slaves.

        Islam, well, if they try anything else there’s always another punitive expedition in the offing. Trying to conquer all 700 million Muslims would be a horrible waste of blood and treasure. Better to just wreck any country, a la Afghanistan, that pulls stuff like 9/11 on us. Iraq was a huge mistake.

  7. Anonymous2 says:

    Inglourious Basterds is extremely nihilistic, more than anything else it is just an ego trip. Every character comes off as despicable, which is probably the intent. You love to hate watching it. The problem with Tarantino is that his moral vacuum films are filled with the beholder’s worst fantasies, and most people aren’t white beta male losers like Tarantino.

  8. El Ibero says:

    Hey JAY! What fo you think of the theory that the Punics/Phoenicians converted to Judaism after the destruction of Carthage? The Maccabee revolt happened almost the same time.

    Hebrew comes fron the Eber-Nari (cross the river) satrap of canaan of the Persian Empire, there is a river in Spain called the Ebro, also the Balearic (Baal) islands.

    • jewamongyou says:

      Believe it or not, I’d never heard that theory, but it doesn’t surprise me; there’s hardly a people on Earth that’s not claimed to have Jewish roots somehow. This one’s intriguing because there were many Jewish Berbers in that area when the Arabs came to conquer centuries later.

      • El Ibero says:

        During the 2nd century BCE to 2nd century CE Jews have being accused by the Greeks of worshipping a Golden Ass (Horse). There is Carthagians gold coins about the Goddess Tanit with the image of a horse.

    • Janon says:

      This is no proven origin of the Hebrews, though many have been proposed. Your theory can join that list. Just because words in different languages sound similar does not mean that they are actually related. Also, why would surviving Carthaginians convert to Judaism rather than persist in their paganism after the Roman conquest? What support do you have for the connection you have dreamt up between the Maccabees, who revolted against the Seleucids and were allies of the Romans, and them? Also, similarity of religious practice between pagans in Judea and Carthaginians shouldn’t surprise us. The Phoenician founders originated from just north of Judea and from a common regional Canaanite milieu.

  9. Attila says:

    I haven’t seen a Hollywood movie in more than 20 years — have I missed anything? Sure ……..

    I’m so sick of seeing blacks and other non-whites splattered all over every conceivable nook and cranny of the media. I refuse to watch or subsidize any part of it. My friends notwithstanding – I predicted that Obamba would turn out to be another Mandela and turn this country into another South Africa – or even Zimbabwe.

    • SFG says:

      You’re wrong. There aren’t enough blacks for that, and they don’t always get along with Hispanics.

      An underachieving country like Brazil is, I think, more likely. Worse than what we have now, but…

  10. I saw this only now. I did see Django unchained. The Black character treacherously started his killing spree when all was peacefully agreed to, all was settled. For some minor personal offense.

    Yes, the villain had killed a Black in a nasty way. That was the reason for our hero to break all agreements, to engage in a killing spree, that got his friend and everyone else killed.

    On the one hand I favor freedom of press, but this is systematic propaganda that incites further violence. Just as all the slavery guilt crap, the “I am Trayvon” propaganda.

    All these politically correct lies about white male guilt incite anger in Blacks (and women).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s