Who attacked Wilfred de Bruijn?

I happened to come across a Yahoo news piece concerning a gay couple that was beaten in Paris recently. Reading the article, one gets the impression that Wilfred de Bruijn was beaten by actual Frenchmen. There is no hint, in the article, that anybody but ethnic French – specifically French Catholics – are to blame. The article concludes with these words:

“We don’t want violence. We denounce this violence and these acts, we have nothing to do with (Catholic) fundamentalists or extremists,” she said.

Not so, for De Bruijn.

“It was not Frigide Barjot who was hitting my head, or the bishop of Avignon lurking in that street to attack us,” he said. “But they are responsible.”

But of course. It’s “Catholic extremists” who, it’s implied, committed the deed or were somehow responsible for it. When I saw this story I immediately suspected Muslims and sure enough, Opposing Views gives us more detail:

A graphic photo (below) of Wilfred de Bruijn, who claims he was assaulted in a Muslim part of Paris, has provoked shock and outrage.

It’s not much of a stretch to surmise that “in a Muslim part of Paris” means the attackers were, in fact, Muslim – or at least of Muslim background. It’s also not surprising that Yahoo blames not the mullahs but “Catholic extremists.”

I could sit here all day long and bash Muslims and white-hating organizations such as Yahoo, but this is not my purpose here. Rather I wanted to use this case to illustrate how the Left, though its policies, brings harm to those it professes to love – and then shamelessly uses this harm as an argument for more of its policies.

The European Left has been promoting massive Muslim/African immigration for decades. Now that those immigrants are attacking gays in the streets of Paris, it turns around and uses such incidents as propaganda to further its gay agenda. The Left pursues “gay rights” not so that gays may live in peace and undisturbed. Not at all! “Gay rights” is merely a vehicle to promote the effeminization of white men in general. If white men respect the gay lifestyle more, they’re more likely to become more effeminate (or so their thinking probably goes). Once they’re more effeminate, they’re less likely to oppose their replacement by sacred “people of color.”

The Left doesn’t want white men with guns. It wants white men dressed in pink and with flowers. White men who are pushovers. If I were gay, I’d be insulted that the Left uses my “rights” toward this end. I’d also make sure I own a gun. Gays have a lot more to fear from Muslims and their leftist enablers than from right-wing whites or “Catholic extremists.”

About jewamongyou

I am a paleolibertarian Jew who is also a race-realist. My opinions are often out of the mainstream and often considered "odd" but are they incorrect? Feel free to set me right if you believe so!
This entry was posted in crime and violence, examples of propaganda, feminism and men's issues, immigration/ Hispanics, Muslims, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Who attacked Wilfred de Bruijn?

  1. SFG says:

    Actually, perhaps of more interest to you is the attacks on Jews in Europe by Muslims. Jewish organizations won’t mention the religion of the attackers, leading you to think they’re being knifed by the Front National, but it shows up in the article comments.

    • EW says:

      There were some complaints especially by French Jews from the Marais quartier in Paris. Of course, Marais is on a direct subway line from the northern suburbs that are totally africanized. But the complaints were very carefully worded as not to hint on the real cause and real perpetrators of these problems.

  2. Tad says:


    I wonder how many of the leftists who do this sort of reporting are gay. In face, I wonder how much of the push for Muslem immigration is coming from actual gays. Maybe gays need to cut their ties to the political Left before it kills them.

  3. viking says:

    they think they will turn the deck on the muslims to one day

  4. Anon says:

    Nothing rational about gays supporting Muslim immigration; so why do they do it?

    Because hatred of white heterosexuality trumps everything, even self-interest. At least up to a point. But when it finally becomes too much for them, to whom will they run for protection?



    • Robert Marchenoir says:

      There’s at least one rational reason in Europe, and especially in France : sex.

      Widespread male homosexual practices are the dirty little secret of Islam (actually, one of many). Gay french intellectuals, businessmen and politicians have traditionally used Morocco as their hunting ground, especially for teen-agers and boys. There’s a whole literary tradition around this.

  5. Misguided self-flagellation. Feelings over consequences. What’s new?

  6. Robert Marchenoir says:

    Of course they were jumped by Muslims. I live in France and there is absolutely no doubt about this, given where it happened.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s