Packs of “young people” cause chaos in Hollywood

It seems those raceless, colorless, “youths” are at it again. This time they chose to bring their enrichment to Hollywood. According to the Afro-centric rag, USA Today:

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Packs of young people rampaged through Hollywood, knocked down people and stole cellphones and other items before a police sweep halted the marauding and arrested a dozen people, police said Wednesday.

Calls began coming in at around 8:30 p.m. Tuesday that youths were robbing people and stealing T-shirts and other goods from businesses, mainly on Hollywood Boulevard, Lt. Ray Valois said.

Fifteen to 20 young men and women were “attacking victims and taking property,” he said. “Some people may have been knocked down or punched.”

However, no serious injuries were reported.

As many as 40 people may have been involved, splitting into smaller groups and reforming as they looted people nearby, Valois said.

Surveillance video aired on television showed youths roaming along the famed Hollywood Walk of Fame.

It’s about time I say. Let them loot Hollywood. Let them tear it up, burn it down and make its denizens live in fear. I know it won’t happen, but we can at least hope that some of those loathsome producers (yes, the ones who worship blacks and hate whites) get beaten to a pulp in the process. I would pay to see those producers, bandaged and bleeding, being pushed around in wheelchairs, producing movies featuring groups of feral youth rampaging through once-civilized cities. In those movies, the rioters would all be white – and they’d be beating up innocent black people. And then, after a hard day’s work producing propaganda, they would venture out and get thrown off their wheelchairs by some more raceless, colorless, “young people”. But it’s okay, because those acts will not be hatecrimes. Rather, they’ll be “random” acts of violence. Or perhaps they’ll be crimes of “boredom.” Because everybody knows that when blacks commit crime, they’re raceless and colorless. They don’t riot. They “protest.” They don’t spread STD’s. They “suffer” from them. They’re victims of homicide and domestic violence, but they’re not perpetrators. They endure racism from whites, but they themselves are colorblind. This is what Hollywood would have us believe.

So let us invite those Trayvons back to Hollywood for some more fun and merriment. I’ll even pay for their bus tickets.

About jewamongyou

I am a paleolibertarian Jew who is also a race-realist. My opinions are often out of the mainstream and often considered "odd" but are they incorrect? Feel free to set me right if you believe so!
This entry was posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, examples of propaganda. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Packs of “young people” cause chaos in Hollywood

  1. Justin says:

    Hollywood is a crappy place where the producers you are hoping to experience this don’t go, let alone live. The people probably most affected are going to be tourists who were already thinking to themselves, “This is Hollywood…let’s go back to Santa Monica, Disneyland…anywhere but here.”

  2. Anon says:

    I would venture to suggest that “Hollywood” ( in the sense you meant it), being intensely narcissistic, and therefore having a very acute sense of its own self-interest, will only come to its senses when it seriously risks becoming the actual victim of its own propaganda..

    Of course, the originators of these scripted lies take care to distance themselves from the ugly realities they do so much to create, but there eventually comes a tipping point when they irrevocably foul their own nests.

    Since the dynamics of these events are non-linear, it is entirely possible the oligarchs will mis-calculate, and scenes analogous to what you describe might actually happen.

    It is no accident, for example, that the biggest group of emigre South Africans are white liberals who left the country AFTER the end of apartheid, in the realization that they would have no immunity from the feral violence, rape and corruption that they themselves had brought into being, in their ceaseless self-congratulatory quest for “justice”..

    It’s no coincidence that Hollywood got on this bandwagon as well.

    Anon.

  3. Thanatos says:

    “It’s about time I say. Let them loot Hollywood.”

    Something tells me that before l’affaire Trayvon is all over, even liberals will be fans of the second amendment.

    Eventually, all the conditions that liberals have brought into being will start killing them and they will be mystified as to how it all happened.

    • jewamongyou says:

      More likely they’ll blame us. They’ll claim that our “hateful blogging” has causes those poor people of color to lose control and become violent. They’ll use such incidents to further curtail our freedom of speech and enact “hate-speech” laws in the U.S.

      • Thanatos says:

        Sadly, I believe you are correct. They can’t actually stop us,though. I was going to say that given that we are talking about Western Civ, speakeasies for non-PC thinkers may arise in response to the increasingly hostile attention directed at us….then I remembered what I was doing and felt foolish for my lapse in situational awareness.

        In any case, this will continue until it reaches a satisfactory conclusion, the only thing that can check it is guns and courts, and that may have the effect of fanning the flames instead, depending on how they handle it. You are talking about a group of people who overthrew a perfectly good monarchy over a few cents extra for tea.

      • Takuan Seiyo says:

        Yes, but that is just one more stage in the dialectic of denial. It too will crumble under the onslaught of Reality, but not before the Body Snatchers have done us grievous harm and so destroyed a key part of the ramparts between themselves and the implacable hyenas. To the list of the enemies of Reality who will do all they can to destroy us and then will themselves become a juicy victim of their cherished pet populations you may want to add women, academics, white urban dwellers, white main-denomination practicing Christians, Jews, Scandinavians and American-Hindus.

  4. Hizzle says:

    Jewamongyou,

    I can tell you haven’t lived in LA. “Hollywood” the tinsel town industry is just a name attached to the film industry and its abstract tentacles which include everything from red carpet premiers to the foothills of Mulholland Drive. Hollywood the neighborhood is a lower middle-class to outright ghetto shit hole. The movie producers live far, far away from where this rioting is taking place. “Hollywood” the abstract concept hasn’t shared physical real estate with the film colony since the days of Nathaniel West. You know, like in Barton Fink or Day of the Locusts?

  5. Hindu Observer says:

    “I know it won’t happen, but we can at least hope that some of those loathsome producers (yes, the ones who worship blacks and hate whites) get beaten to a pulp in the process.”

    You Americans are very interesting to me. White ones complain the media hates them and loves blacks while black ones claim the media hates them and loves whites. Furthermore they all use the same exact same examples to illustrate their points. Such as that Cheerios commercial.

    You certainly are a funny lot.

    • Thanatos says:

      “You Americans are very interesting to me. White ones complain the media hates them and loves blacks while black ones claim the media hates them and loves whites. Furthermore they all use the same exact same examples to illustrate their points.”

      White Americans have never had Affirmative Action,Hindu. The only reason those black media “professionals” have jobs is because more qualified whites were told not to apply.

      You can make up your own mind about which group the media loves, but if you’ve been following the Trayvon Martin affair, you’ll know that a hispanic guy was described as a white for the purposes of vilifying him as a racist, and they’ve uniformly described his actions (which were recognized as self-defense by our court system) as “murder”, “stalking an innocent unarmed (who had a handgun,but not on him, and a burglary tool which he jettisoned into the bushes when Z-man spotted him) black child”. The guy followed him, while on the phone with the police,reporting his actions to the police dispatcher as he kept track of him.

      Does that sound like a racist murderer lying in wait for a black child (who was a few months shy of being legally an adult) to you? If not for bias against whites, why would so many news outlets have this opinion (which is actually a crime to express here,and they will go to court for saying he was a murderer after being acquitted)? How rabid must their bias against whites be to risk jail time in order to call a hispanic guy a white racist murderer?

      Are blacks as a group ever treated this way by the majority of our media, watching as an outsider?

      • Hindu Observer says:

        I wasn’t talking about media professionals, of which the overwhelming majority of them in the USA are white (perhaps Jewish too!). I was talking about media consumers. Those who watch TV, go to movies, etc.

        I’ve read many white blogs complaining about how white men are portrayed in commercials, shows and movies as stupid, unattractive, unethical, etc while black men are supposedly portrayed as smart, attractive, ethical etc.

        Then you go to a black blog and they are complaining that white men are portrayed as smart, attractive, ethical while black men are portrayed as stupid, ugly, thugs, etc.

        Then you’ve got white people complaining about all the interracial couples displayed in the media, as if its a conspiracy to brainwash Americans into “miscegenation”. They also claim, “only the white race is expected to date and marry out, not other races”.

        And then you’ve got Black people saying the exact same thing but in reverse. That there is a conspiracy to show black people dating and marrying whites and other non-blacks and that it is a plot to “destroy black love and family unity” and how “only blacks are expected to do this”.

        And BOTH use the exact same media bytes as examples of “evidence” to their conspiracy theories, such as the Cheerios commercial.

        White men are saying, “Just see. They are showing a white wife with a black husband because the underlying message is that white men are not good or attractive enough” and Black women are saying, “Just see. They are showing a black husband with a white wife because they underlying message is that black women are not good or attractive enough”.

        ITS HILARIOUS!!!!!

        By the way, mixed race people make up around 15% of the US population yet I’m not seeing anywhere near that % being represented in American media.

        So what’s all the hullaballoo?

        If anything I’d think the mixed race people should be complaining about how they are not represented ENOUGH in commercials, TV shows and movies.

      • jewamongyou says:

        Regarding the portrayal of black men with white women, white men and black women should be allies against it. I’ve pointed out, in this blog, that the media considers black women to be inferior (beauty-wise) and white men to be inferior. Both groups have valid complaints – about the same commercials (for example). I’ve pointed out that miscegenation is strongly encouraged by the media. If not for their forceful campaign, there would be far fewer interracial couples. White women are being sold to black men as if they’re some sort of product. Black men are being sold to white women in the same way.

      • Hindu Observer says:

        JAY, “Regarding the portrayal of black men with white women, white men and black women should be allies against it. I’ve pointed out, in this blog, that the media considers black women to be inferior (beauty-wise) and white men to be inferior. Both groups have valid complaints – about the same commercials (for example).”

        I’m not seeing examples in the media of white men being portrayed as “inferior”. They are still overwhelmingly the majority of heroes, smart guys, good guys and romantic leads in American media.

        Regarding that Cheerios commercial, while white men are saying its a “jab” at white hubbies and dads, black people are saying it portrayed the black husband as fat, lazy and dumb who had to be schooled by his white wife in healthy eating.

        Really it was just a regular ol’ commercial with a cute kid in it. Why all the fuss?

        ” I’ve pointed out that miscegenation is strongly encouraged by the media. If not for their forceful campaign, there would be far fewer interracial couples.”

        Nonsense. There is no “forceful campaign”. Interracial couples make up at least 15% of the population in the States yet they are severely UNDER represented in the media.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s